Search Results for "superior's instructions"

540 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 540 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs BEST Undertaking to Pay 30% of Retiral Dues to Ex-Employees, Recognizing Their Absolute Entitlement. Non-Payment Due to Financial Constraints of BEST Undertaking and Over-Dependence on MCGM and State Government Held Unacceptable.

This batch of writ petitions was filed by ex-employees of the Brihanmumbai Electricity Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST) seeking payment of unpa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Assault on Public Servant Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Grievous Hurt. Conviction under Sections 504 and 333 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Essential Ingredients Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Dayanand S/o Makkanna Patil, was convicted by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bidar, sitting at Basavakalyan, in S.C.No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Search and Seizure Provisions. Failure to Join Independent Witnesses and Non-Observance of Section 50 of NDPS Act Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellants, Sau. Mankarna, Sau. Panchafula, and Udaybhan, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, under Section 20(B)(2)(c) of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Seizure of Vehicles Under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 — Held That Seizure Without Notice and Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Section 105 of the Act Requires Show-Cause Notice Before Confiscation.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by owners of vehicles that were seized by the State Excise Department under Section 105 of the M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Policeman in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, a policeman attached to the Highway Security Squad, was convicted by the Special Judge, Satara, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals of Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act. Conviction for Possession of Hashish Set Aside as Search and Seizure Were Conducted Without Proper Authorization and Without Informing Accused of Their Rights.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by Satyawan Pagi (A1) and Vimal Singh (A2) against their conviction and sentence under Section 20(b)(ii)(...