Search Results for "summon witness"

459 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 459 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Section 311 CrPC Application in Criminal Appeal — Power Under Section 311 CrPC Cannot Be Invoked After Conclusion of Trial

The petitioner, Mahesh Ahirrao, along with respondents 2 and 3, faced trial for offences under Sections 420, 465, 468, 471 read with 34 of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Sessions Court Order Under Section 311 Cr.PC for Lack of Jurisdiction After Case Posted for Judgment. Sessions Court Cannot Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 Cr.PC Once Matter Reserved for Judgment.

The petitioners, accused nos.1 to 3 in S.C.No.239/2017 pending before the I Addl. Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi, for offences punishable under Sections 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Suit as Attesting Witnesses Deny Testator's Presence During Execution. Will Not Proved in Solemn Form Due to Non-Compliance with Section 63(c) of Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The dispute concerned the estate of Sahadev Deraj Shah, who died on 5th January 1998. His second wife, Shobhana, and the executors propounded a Will d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction for Criminal Conspiracy and Murder Under Sections 120B, 302 r/w 34 IPC. Appeals Challenge Reliability of Eye-Witness Identification and Dying Declaration, Along with Conspiracy Evidence Against Accused Nos. 4 to 6.

The Bombay High Court heard five criminal appeals arising out of Sessions Case No.164 of 2011 decided by the Sessions Judge, Solapur on 8 May 2014. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Re-examination of Complainant in NI Act Case Under Section 311 CrPC. The court held that re-examination to prove a document is permissible for just decision and does not prejudice the accused.

The petitioner, Balu Bajirao Shinde, challenged an order passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Patoda, in Summary Criminal Case No. 477 of 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Relatives in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Omnibus Allegations. FIR under Sections 498A, 34 IPC and Sections 3, 4 Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, and DV Act complaint quashed for lack of specific overt acts against appellants.

The Supreme Court allowed appeals by Appellants, quashing criminal proceedings arising from matrimonial discord between (complainant) and her husband ...