Search Results for "show-cause notice"

273 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 273 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Gratuity for Bank Employee Found Guilty of Financial Irregularities. Disciplinary Inquiry Sufficient for Forfeiture Under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972; Acts Amount to Wilful Omission and Moral Turpitude.

The petitioner, Nanubhai Nichhabhai Desai, worked as a clerk with UCO Bank for over 31 years. His services were terminated by compulsory retirement wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Chapter Proceedings Under Section 107 CrPC Based on Single FIR Without Independent Material. Mere Registration of Criminal Case Insufficient to Justify Preventive Action Under Section 107 CrPC.

The petitioners, Sandeep Shivaji Mhatre, Tushar Bhimsen Saigaokar, and Nilesh @ Sonu Mahanand Jadhav, filed three separate criminal writ petitions cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Contract and Forfeiture of Earnest Money in Coal Transport Tender Dispute. Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Application of Mind by Western Coalfields Limited Leads to Setting Aside of Order Cancelling Letter of Allotment and Debarment.

The petitioners, including a joint venture firm and its constituents, challenged an order dated 19.2.2014 passed by the respondents, Western Coalfield...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Discharges Respondents in Suo Motu Criminal Contempt for Alleged Willful Disobedience of Court Orders. Court holds that mere breach of undertaking does not constitute criminal contempt unless it scandalizes or lowers authority of court.

The High Court of Bombay initiated suo motu criminal contempt proceedings against respondent no.1 (M.N. Navale, President of Sinhgad Technical Educati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case on Unjust Enrichment. Bar of Unjust Enrichment Not Applicable to Provisional Assessment Cases Prior to Amendment of Rule 9B of Central Excise Rules, 1944.

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-III Commissionerate, against the judgment of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Ap...