Search Results for "review petition"

6047 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6047 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Appointment Case — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Court holds that review cannot be used as an appeal and that the arbitrator's appointment under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not subject to review on merits.

The petitioners, Roptonal Ltd (formerly Indian Film Company (Cyprus) Ltd) and Viacom 18 Media Pvt. Ltd., filed a review petition in the Bombay High Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Specific Performance Suit — No Error Apparent on Record Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC. Promoter of Proposed Cooperative Society Held to Have Locus Standi to Sue for Specific Performance Despite Society Being Unregistered.

The case arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 12 August 1981. The plaintiff, Respondent No.1, as chief promoter ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Electricity Tariff Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record Found. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to errors apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used to re-argue the merits of the case.

The judgment pertains to four Civil Review Applications (Nos. 23, 24, 25 and 26 of 2011) filed by industrial consumers against the State of Goa and th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court's Review Order Directing Re-evaluation of Judicial Service Examination Answer Scripts. Re-evaluation Cannot Be Ordered in Absence of Statutory Provision or Demonstrated Material Error.

The appeal arose from an order of the Gauhati High Court allowing a review petition filed by the first respondent, a candidate in the Tripura Judicial...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Application in Student Attendance Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Review jurisdiction under Order XLVII CPC not available to re-agitate merits where examination already concluded.

The applicant, Ankita Jagannath Sonawale, a post-graduate law student at Maharashtra National Law University, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, was disallowe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Arbitration Case — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Court holds that review cannot be used as an appeal and that the judgment in Maula Bux v. Union of India was not applicable to the facts of the case.

The case involves two review applications filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S. Rules read with Order XLVIII Rule 1(a) and Section 114 of the Code of C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Trust Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Direction to Implead Trustee in Appeal Before Charity Commissioner Was Made with Consent and Is Not Contrary to Order XLI Rule 20 CPC.

The review petitioner, Ganesh N. Salunkhe, sought review of an order dated 4 February 2015 passed in Writ Petition No. 174 of 2015. The order directed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Matter Due to Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 5 of Arbitration Act. Review Petition Against Order Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Held Not Maintainable as Review Not Provided Under Part I of the Act.

The petitioner, M/s Madhav Structural Engineering Ltd., was awarded a contract by the respondent, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd.,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Review Petition to Permit Gate and Fencing on Sub-Divided Land in Co-Ownership Dispute. Petitioner permitted to erect gate and barbed wire fencing on its share of land as per City Survey sub-division, subject to no objection from respondent No. 3.

The petitioner, Shrikant Studios Pvt. Ltd., filed a review petition seeking to modify the order dated 30th August 2022 to permit it to put a gate and ...