Search Results for "regular summons"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "regular summons"

802 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 802 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Accused in Prevention of Corruption Act Case on Ground of Delay. Applying Guidelines from P. Ramachandra Rao v. State of Karnataka, Court Holds that Under Section 13(1)(e) Read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Delay Attributable to Accused Seeking Adjournments Does Not Constitute Violation of Article 21.

21 Dec 2010

Background: Petitioner Reshma Singh, along with her mother, step-brother, and one Manjit Singh Khera (inspector), were accused in Special Case No. 39/...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Condonation of Delay in Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree — Pendency of Application to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree Not Sufficient Cause Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963. The court held that proceedings to set aside an ex-parte decree do not constitute sufficient cause for condoning delay in filing an appeal against the decree.

20 Aug 2014

The petitioners, original plaintiffs in a partition suit, obtained an ex-parte decree in Regular Civil Suit No. 35 of 2007. The respondents (defendant...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows EPFO Appeal Against HMT Limited in Provident Fund Dues Recovery Case — Establishes That Public Sector Undertakings Are Not Exempt from EPF Act Coverage and Recovery Proceedings. The Court Held That the EPF Act Applies to All Establishments Covered Under Section 1(3) and That the Respondent's Financial Difficulties Do Not Bar Recovery of Statutory Dues.

27 Jun 2023

The case involves an appeal filed by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and the Recovery Officer of the Employees' Provident Fund Organization (...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals by Sahara Companies on SEBI's Regulatory Powers Over OFCDs. Case centers on Section 55A(b) Companies Act and compliance with DIP Guidelines for issuance of optionally fully convertible debentures.

1 Aug 2026

The case involved two Sahara Group companies, Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Cut-off Date for Workmen Dues in Winding Up of Swadeshi Mills. Official Liquidator's Calculation Up to Appointment of Provisional Liquidator Challenged by Workmen Seeking Dues Up to Winding Up Order.

28 Oct 2013

The matter concerns a company application filed by five workmen of M/s Swadeshi Mills Co. Ltd., which was wound up. The company had approximately 2970...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Whether an Ex Parte Decree that is Set Aside Later Qualifies as a Decree of Court of First Instance in Preemption Cases. The Court examined the impact of the Haryana amendment to Section 15 of the Punjab Preemption Act, 1913, which removed the preemption right of cosharers, on pending proceedings.

1 Jan 1970

The case involved a dispute over preemption rights under the Punjab Preemption Act, 1913. The appellant, Vijay Singh, a cosharer, filed a suit for pos...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Intervention in Property Suit Appeal — Third Party Claimants Have Right to Be Heard Before Final Determination of Rights. Applicants who are not parties to the suit but claim independent title to the suit property are entitled to intervene in the appeal to protect their interests under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.

16 Feb 2023

The present interim application was filed by two applicants, Arun Sampatrao Patil and Dilip Laxman Kuradkar, seeking to intervene in First Appeal No. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Summary Suit — Defendant's Vague Defence of Security Cheques Not a Triable Issue. The court upheld the decree for Rs.61,00,000/- with interest under Order 37 CPC, as the defendant failed to disclose a plausible defence.

16 Jul 2012

The respondent/plaintiff, Pravin Hiralal Shah, filed a summary suit against the appellant/defendant, Rajesh Laxmichand Udeshi @Bhatia, for recovery of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Attempt to Murder Case on Ground of Parity and Long Incarceration. Co-accused already granted bail; applicants entitled to same relief under Sections 140(2), 308(7), 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

16 Dec 2025

The applicants, Ramdev Singh Jadeja, Vishal Mir, and Chintan Arvindbhai Desai, filed a bail application under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 in con...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Written Statement Filed Beyond 90 Days in CPC Suit — Delay of 24 Days Condoned Due to Plaintiff's Failure to Furnish Documents and Court's Fixing of Later Date. The court held that Order 8 Rule 1 CPC is directory and that the trial court erred in rejecting the written statement without considering the reasons for delay.

27 Jan 2006

The petitioners, defendants in a civil suit, challenged an order rejecting their written statement for being filed 24 days after the expiry of 90 days...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)