Search Results for "regional provident fund commissioner"

222 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 222 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment on Quashing of FIR in EPF Dues Under-Assessment Case — Court Examines Scope of Power Under Article 226 and Section 482 CrPC, Citing R.P. Kapur and Bhajan Lal Precedents

The petitioner, a Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, had passed an assessment order under Section 7A of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscella...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Promotion to Branch Manager in Shabari Tribal Financial Development Corporation Ltd. — Held that Petitioner's Candidature for Promotion to Class-I Post Must Be Considered as Per Recruitment Rules.

The petitioner, Shridhar Sambhaji Dhale, possessed a Master's degree in Commerce and joined as Junior Assistant in 1979 with the Maharashtra State Co-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Pension Benefits to Urban Malaria Department Employees of Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation — Employees Held Entitled to Pensionary Benefits Under BPMC Pension Rules Despite Being on Contract Basis

The petitioners, employees of the Urban Malaria Department of Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation, filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Const...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Partly Allows Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Pension Calculation for Daily Wager Employees. Daily Wager Service Prior to Regularization Does Not Qualify as Pensionable Service Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, as Appointments Were Not Against Sanctioned Posts.

The dispute involved Nagpur Municipal Corporation challenging an Industrial Court order that granted pensionary benefits to daily wager employees by c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Payment to Retired Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 requires proof of financial loss caused by employee's misconduct, not merely disciplinary punishment of compulsory retirement.

The petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 197...