Search Results for "reconstruction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "reconstruction"

825 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 825 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Secured Creditors in SARFAESI Act Case — Holds Chief Judicial Magistrate Competent Under Section 14. The Court resolved the conflict among High Courts by interpreting that the CJM can exercise powers under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, for taking possession of secured assets in non-metropolitan areas.

23 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court resolved a conflict among High Courts regarding the interpretation of Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Tenant's Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case — Oral Tenancy After Mortgage Not Protected. Tenant's claim of tenancy based on oral agreement after mortgage creation cannot defeat bank's right to take possession under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act.

11 Sep 2019

The present appeal arises from an order of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Esplanade, Mumbai, dated 31.12.2014, rejecting the application of the ap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Guarantors in SFC Act Recovery Case — Directors Held Jointly and Severally Liable for Company Loan. Guarantors Cannot Raise Defences of Principal Debtor Under Section 31(1)(aa) of State Financial Corporation Act, 1951.

26 Feb 2019

The appeal arises from a judgment dated 19th September 2007 passed by the learned Adhoc District Judge, Pune, in Miscellaneous Civil Petition No.859 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Guarantors in SFC Act Recovery Proceedings — Guarantors Held Jointly and Severally Liable Under Section 31(1)(aa) of State Financial Corporation Act, 1951. Application Under Section 31(1)(aa) is Maintainable Against Guarantors Without Separate Suit and Not Barred by Limitation.

26 Feb 2019

The appeal arises from a judgment dated 19th September 2007 passed by the learned Adhoc District Judge, Pune, in Miscellaneous Civil Petition No.859 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition for Interim Relief Despite Pending SICA Reference — Guarantors' Liability Not Barred by SICA. Financial Institution's Petition Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Receiver and Injunction Against Guarantors Held Maintainable Despite Principal Borrower's Pending Reference Under Section 15(1) of SICA.

17 Feb 2012

The Petitioner, Tata Capital Ltd., a financial institution, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking int...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment of Acquired Property Under MHADA Based on Settlement Between Owners, Tenants, and Builder. Court Holds That Once Acquisition Notification Lapses, Property Can Be Redeveloped by Private Parties with Consent of All Stakeholders.

28 Nov 2011

The petitioners, comprising owners (Petitioners 1 & 2), tenants (Petitioners 3 to 10), and a builder (Petitioner 11), filed a writ petition challengin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in PMC Compound Wall Demolition Case — Construction Prior to Inclusion in Municipal Limits Not Subject to Section 478 Notice. Notice under Section 478 of BPMC Act, 1949 cannot be issued for a wall constructed before property came within municipal limits; alternatively, such notice cannot be construed as one under Section 260.

19 Oct 2011

The appellant, Ninad Sah. Gruharachana Sanstha Mydt., owned a property in Pune. In 1969, before the property was included within the limits of the Pun...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.

29 Jul 2011

This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Clarifies FSI Entitlement in Trust Property Development Dispute. Official Trustee Granted Declaration That Developer Is Entitled to Only 2294 Sq. Ft. FSI by Way of TDR Under Memorandum of Understanding and Court Order Dated 8.8.1997.

9 Mar 2005

The Official Trustee, Maharashtra State, filed a petition seeking clarification and directions regarding an order dated 8.8.1997 passed in Trust Petit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Bombay Rent Act — Landlord's Bona Fide Need for Demolition and Reconstruction Upheld. The court held that the landlord's requirement for demolition and reconstruction was bona fide and the tenant failed to establish greater hardship under Section 13(1)(hh) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a writ petition filed by the tenants, Vaman Ramlal Naik and Prakash Ramlal Naik, challenging the order of the appellate authority un...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)