KAHC030005792015_1
24 Apr 2020The judgment relates to a conglomeration of appeals and cross-objections arising out of land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Karnata...
Search Results for "price increase"
993 result(s) found
Found 993 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tender Notification in Lalbagh Entry Fee Collection Case — Violation of Transparency and Level Playing Field. Fresh Tender Directed with Revised Conditions to Ensure Fair Competition Under Article 14 of the Constitution.
16 May 2023The petitioner, Karnataka Commercial and Industrial Corporation Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company engaged in manpower services and collection of en...
- 62
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission’s Distribution Open Access Regulations. Challenge Concerns Alleged Jurisdictional Overreach Curtailing Consumers’ Right to Access Power Exchange Under the Electricity Act, 2003.
30 Oct 2015The provided text is an incomplete extract of a judgment from the Bombay High Court in a set of writ petitions (WP Nos. 2694/2014, 2318/2014, 2294/201...
- 45
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging E-Auction of Sand Ghats — Time-Limited Auction Process Upheld as Valid. Court holds that introduction of time limit in e-auction is not arbitrary and that disconnection of internet link does not vitiate auction when petitioner failed to report promptly.
16 Jan 2013The petitioner, Arunodaya Magaswargiya Mazdoor Kamgar Sahakari Sanstha Ltd., a labour cooperative society registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative...
- 122
High Court
High Court of Bombay Examines Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Subsidy for Grain Alcohol Production Under GR Dated 08.06.2007. Petitioner Seeks Direction to Grant Special Subsidy/Incentive of Rs. 10 Per Bulk Litre and Quashing of Rejection Order Dated 24.11.2021.
9 May 2025The present writ petition was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under its civil appellate jurisdiction by Karan Distilleries Pvt. Lt...
- 56
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petitions by Contractor and Unions Over Payment of Increased Minimum Wages Under Municipal Solid Waste Tender. Dispute Centers on Implementation of General Body Resolution and Notification Under Payment of Wages Act, 1936.
26 Oct 2018The Bombay High Court, exercising writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, considered a batch of petitions arising from a mun...
- 108
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Flat Buyers Against Developer for Delayed Possession, Holds Unilateral Compensation Clause Unfair. Developer's stipulation of Rs 5 per sq ft per month as liquidated damages for delay held inadequate and unconscionable; flat buyers entitled to compensation at 6% per annum on amounts paid.
24 Aug 2020The case involves appeals by 171 flat buyers against the dismissal of their consumer complaint by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ...
- 274
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Explanations to Rule 38 of MCR, 2016 and Rule 45(8)(a) of MCDR, 2017 — Royalty Computation on Gross Sale Value Without Deduction of Royalty, DMF, and NMET Contributions is Valid. The Court held that royalty is a tax and not a contractual consideration, and the impugned explanations do not violate Article 14 or Article 265 of the Constitution.
15 Nov 2024The petitioners, Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the validity...
- 485
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Reference, Enhances Compensation for Acquired Land Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court Determined Market Value Based on Comparable Sale Instances and Potential for Development, Rejecting Government's Valuation Method.
30 Nov -0001The case is a land acquisition reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, arising from the acquisition of land belonging to Godrej ...
- 181
High Court
Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge to Levy of VAT on Liquor by Certain Licensees; Alleged Discrimination Between Different Categories of Excise Licence Holders. Petitioners Contend That Notification Exempting Some Dealers While Taxing Others Violates Articles 14, 19, and 304B of the Constitution.
30 Sep 2015The writ petitions were filed by various licensees under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1967, challenging the constitutional validity of Entry No.59A of th...
- 92
