Search Results for "penalty under Excise Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "penalty under Excise Rules"

428 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 428 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Answers Reference Against Assessee in Cenvat Credit Reversal Case for Exempted Goods. Supreme Court Precedent Requires Reversal Even When No Sale Involved Under Rule 57CC of Central Excise Rules, 1944.

25 Jun 2026

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Salem filed a reference case under Section 35H(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, seeking an answer to a question...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Transfer Order in ONGC — No Violation of Service Rules Found. Transfer order issued on administrative grounds upheld as petitioner failed to establish mala fides or breach of transfer policy.

4 May 2026

The petitioner, Rajinder Paul Bharadwaj, was working as Manager (MM) in the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) at Mumbai. He was transferred ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Valuation Dispute — Poly Packs of Chewing Tobacco Held as Group Packages Intended for Retail Sale Under Section 4A of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court held that poly packs containing multiple pouches with MRP printed are group packages under Rule 2(g) of Standards of Weights & Measures (Packaged Commodity) Rules, 1977, and not exempt under Rule 34(b) as net weight exceeds 10 gms.

8 Jul 2024

The appeals arose from a judgment of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal which had set aside the Commissioner's order confirming a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds CAT Order for Payment of Arrears of Salary to Driver Reinstated After Acquittal in Corruption Case. No Justification for Denying Full Back Wages During Intervening Period of Compulsory Retirement.

20 Jun 2023

The Union of India filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 9 August 2018 in Original Applicatio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in GST Provisional Attachment Case, Reversing High Court's Dismissal on Maintainability Grounds. The High Court Erred in Dismissing Writ Petition Solely Due to Alternative Remedy Under Section 107 of the Himachal Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, Without Examining Merits of Provisional Attachment Orders Under Section 83.

20 Apr 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment dated 1 January 2021 by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, which dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 of the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revision Condonation Delay in Himachal Pradesh VAT Act — Section 5 Limitation Act Applicable. High Court's revisional power under Section 48 of the HP VAT Act, 2005 includes power to condone delay under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 as Section 29(2) applies unless expressly excluded.

25 Oct 2019

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Himachal Pradesh High Court's judgment dated 19.11.2018, which refused to condone delay in filing rev...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Vodafone's Appeal on CENVAT Credit for Telecom Towers and Shelters. CENVAT Credit on Towers and Prefabricated Buildings Denied as They Are Immovable Property and Not Capital Goods Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

10 Sep 2015

The Appellant, Vodafone India Ltd., filed appeals under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, cha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against CESTAT Pre-Deposit Order in CENVAT Credit Case — Prima Facie Case for Waiver of Pre-Deposit Established. The Court held that the appellant had made out a strong prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as the statements relied upon were retracted and no opportunity for cross-examination was given.

8 May 2015

The appellant, Ms. Arjandas Metal Industries Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against an order dated 10th ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Limitation Bar Upheld. Show Cause Notice Issued After Six Years Held Time-Barred as Assessee Did Not Suppress Facts.

22 Jun 2011

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Goa, filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against the order of the Customs, Excise a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Order in Central Excise Duty Evasion Case. Petitioner, a 100% EOU, cleared goods to DTA without permission and duty payment, leading to demand of Rs. 33,96,718/-.

10 Aug 2010

The petitioner, M/s. Viva Herba Pvt. Ltd., a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) engaged in manufacturing vegetable extracts, filed a writ petition under ...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)