Search Results for "patent illegality"

1383 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1383 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Broadcast Rights Dispute — Upholds Award of Rs. 4.77 Crore with Interest. Arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and quantum of damages were not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Petitioner, Maharashtra Film Stage and Cultural Development Corporation Ltd., a Government of Maharashtra corporation, challenged an Arbitral Awar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as Award Not Found to be Patently Illegal or Perverse.

The petitioner, Sunil Keshav Rane, challenged an arbitral award dated 28 April 2009 passed by an arbitrator under the Byelaws, Rules and Regulations o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Co-ownership Dispute. Court Upholds Award Granting Proportionate Share to Co-owner, Finding No Patent Illegality Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal arose from a decision of a Learned Single Judge dated 8 July 2011 dismissing an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute Due to Perverse Findings. Arbitrator's Failure to Consider Admitted Documents and Ledger Accounts Constitutes Patent Illegality Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Shilpa Stock Broker Pvt. Ltd., a stock broker and member of the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. (NSEIL) and Bombay Stock Exchang...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Interest. Interest Awarded from Arbitrator's Appointment Date Upheld as Within Discretion Under Section 31(7)(a) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Family Property Dispute. Arbitrator's findings on possession and tenancy rights upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, Anil Sital Hansrajani and another, who are brothers and sons of the respondent Sital T. Hansrajani, filed a petition under Section 34...