Search Results for "partnership firm registration"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "partnership firm registration"

680 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 680 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Trademark Infringement Cases for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Court holds that mere existence of a website accessible in Mumbai does not confer jurisdiction under Section 134 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 unless the plaintiff has a business or resides within the court's limits.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves two appeals (Appeal No.340 of 2015 and Appeal No.95 of 2015) heard together by the Bombay High Court. In the first appeal, the a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Implead Legal Representatives in Partition Suit — Held That Application Under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC Was Not Maintainable as Defendant No.2 Was Already on Record and No Abatement Had Occurred

8 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Sri Janardhana Suvarna, was Defendant No.2 in O.S.No.233/2016, a suit for partition and separate possession filed by Respondent No.1 (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Cooperative Society's Bye-Law Amendment and Registration of Transfer of Shares. Held that the Competent Authority under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 has jurisdiction to decide disputes regarding membership and transfer of shares, and that the society's bye-law amendment requiring prior approval for transfer of shares is valid.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed in the Bombay High Court. The first petition (Writ Petition No. 9116 of 2013) was filed by Farhat Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over 'Café Madras' Restaurant Name. The mark 'Café Madras' held to be inherently distinctive and entitled to protection against use by a subsequent restaurant of the same name.

11 Mar 2015

The plaintiffs, the Kamath family, have been running a restaurant named 'Café Madras' in Matunga, Mumbai since 1938. The restaurant has acquired a re...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dharwad Bench Hears Appeal Against Permanent Injunction in Trademark Dispute Over ‘KITCHEN KING’ Brand. Trial Court Had Restrained Defendant from Using Deceptively Similar Mark and Awarded Damages.

14 Feb 2025

The appeal arose from a judgment and decree dated 24.07.2017 in O.S. No.7/2012 passed by the Principal District Judge, Ballari. The plaintiff, a regis...

High Court

Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, Considers Election Petition Alleging Improper Rejection of Nomination Under Section 9A of Representation of the People Act, 1951. Petitioner Claims Retirement from Partnership Firm Removed Disqualification Before Scrutiny Date.

5 Apr 2018

The petitioner, a former partner in M/s. Musale Construction, intended to contest the 2014 Maharashtra Legislative Assembly election from 49-Saoner co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against 'ULTRA TUFF' Cement for Infringing 'ULTRATECH CEMENT' Trademark and Passing Off. The court held that the mark 'ULTRA TUFF' is deceptively similar to the registered trademark 'ULTRATECH CEMENT The Engineer's Choice' under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and restrained the defendants from using the mark.

28 Jun 2011

The plaintiff, Ultra Tech Cement Limited, filed a suit alleging that the defendants, Alaknanda Cement Pvt. Ltd. and another, were infringing its regis...

High Court

Bombay High Court pronounces judgment on Letters Patent appeals in oppression and mismanagement case under Companies Act, 1956 — dispute over diversion of Contship agency business. The Court examined whether directors' diversion of business opportunity amounted to oppression and breach of fiduciary duty under Sections 397, 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 and Section 88 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882.

31 Mar 2006

The appeals arose from a dispute between the Puri Group and the Sippy Group, both holding equal shares and equal directorships in two private Indian s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trademark Infringement Suit by Bristol Bakery Against Grupo Bimbo for 'Bimbo' Mark, Finding No Deceptive Similarity. The court held that the marks 'Bristol' and 'Bimbo' are not deceptively similar and that the defendant had prior rights, thereby refusing interim injunction and granting injunction in favor of the defendant.

6 Jul 2026

The judgment concerns two cross-suits between Bristol Bakery (plaintiff in one suit) and Grupo Bimbo S.A.B. DE C.V. and its affiliates (defendants in ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Criminal Application for Quashing Summons in Security Guards Act Violation. Allegations Against Officers as Principal Employers Prima Facie Disclose Offence Under Clause 42 of Maharashtra Private Security Guards Scheme, 2002.

10 May 2013

The matter arose from a criminal complaint filed by Inspector R.D. Khanorkar under the Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulation of Employment a...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)