Search Results for "packing materials"

149 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 149 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Duty Refund for Re-imported Goods Under Section 26(1)(b) of Customs Act, 1962 — Re-importation Within One Year of Export Qualifies for Refund Despite Procedural Lapses

The petitioner, Covestro India Private Limited, exported certain goods for exhibition purposes and subsequently re-imported them. The petitioner paid ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Maharashtra State Handlooms Corporation Against ESI Coverage for Akola Sale Depot. Sale Depot Held to Be a 'Shop' Under Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, Requiring Payment of ESI Contributions.

The appellant, Maharashtra State Handlooms Corporation Limited, challenged the judgment and order dated 18.01.2010 passed by the Industrial Court, Ako...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in VAT Dispute — Purchase Price Under GVAT Act Does Not Include VAT Component. Value Added Tax and unclaimed tax credit purchases excluded from taxable turnover of purchases for reduction of tax credit under Section 11(3)(b) of Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

The State of Gujarat appealed against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court which affirmed the order of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal. The dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Blacklisting Order Against Pharmaceutical Distributor for Violation of Natural Justice. Blacklisting Without Show Cause Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Held Invalid Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, M/s. Sujal Pharma, a proprietorship firm engaged in pharmaceutical distribution, challenged a blacklisting order dated 29.10.2021 issu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition for Missing Female Baby — No Illegal Detention Established. Court holds that habeas corpus is not maintainable when the alleged detenu is not in custody of respondents and the petitioner fails to prove illegal detention.

The petitioner, Smt. Shankramma Poojari, a fruit vendor, filed a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before...