Search Results for "outstanding payments"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "outstanding payments"

812 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 812 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Holds That Payments Made to Authorized Representatives of Partnership Firm Are Valid Under Contract Act. Burden of Proof Shifts to Defendants When Plaintiff Proves Payment to Persons Held Out as Authorized in Brochure.

31 Mar 2017

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiff, Mr. Sharad Prabhudas, against the judgment of the First Appellate Court which rever...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Interim Order Directing Deposit of Mortgage Deeds and Injunction in Commercial Suit Concerning Mortgage Charge Rights. Appeal Challenges Order Requiring Deposit of Registered Deeds of Simple Mortgage and Restraining Reliance on Them, with Appellant Contending Non-Satisfaction of Twin Conditions Under Section 31 of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

6 May 2025

The dispute arose from competing mortgage claims over property known as 'Ghia Compound' located at Santacruz and Bandra village. J.C. Flowers Asset Re...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Money Recovery Suit — Admission of Liability in Written Statement Constitutes Acknowledgment Under Section 18 of Limitation Act, 1963. Suit for Recovery of Money Based on Supply of Goods Held Not Time-Barred Due to Defendant's Admission.

22 Oct 2021

The case involves a suit for recovery of money filed by M/s. Jindal Steels, a partnership firm (plaintiff), against Trident Architectural Aluminium Pr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Application for Rejection of Plaint Based on Unregistered Lease and Determination of Lease. Court Examines Whether Plaint Discloses Cause of Action for Specific Performance and Monetary Claims Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

4 Mar 2014

The case involved a suit for specific performance and a money decree filed by Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd (plaintiff) against the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Disposes of PIL Challenging Interest Accrual During COVID-19 Moratorium After Government Announces Relief Measures. Petitioner expressed satisfaction with government's decision to waive interest on specified loan categories up to Rs.2 Crores.

19 Nov 2020

The petitioner, Gajendra Sharma, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the Reserve Bank of India's notification dated...

High Court

High Court Quashes Tax Refund Adjustment Order for Violation of Settlement Scheme and Natural Justice. Adjustment of refund for one tax period against demand for another under proviso to Section 50(1) of Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 held invalid when petitioner had applied under Maharashtra Settlement of Arrears of Tax, Interest, Penalty or Late Fees Act, 2023 and no defect notice was issued.

12 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a proprietorship concern registered under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 challenging a settlement order dated 18 April...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Compliance of Settlement in Contempt Proceedings for Non-Renewal of Licenses - Home Buyers' Interests Paramount. The Court held that the Mittal Group must pay renewal license fee and avail OTS scheme, while the Seth Group must pay its share of EDC and furnish documents, failing which contempt action including attachment and imprisonment would follow.

9 Oct 2020

The dispute in this contempt petition arises from a Memorandum of Settlement (MOS) dated 04.05.2015 between the Seth Group and the Mittal Group, which...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Appeals by Bank in Securitisation Act Case Regarding Maintainability of Civil Suits — The Court Examines Whether Plaints Against Bank Are Barred Under Section 34 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

26 Oct 2018

The litigation arose from a batch of five civil suits filed by several plaintiffs against M/s. Orbit Corporation Ltd. and Axis Bank Limited, concernin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Suit for Recovery Due to Prior Arbitration Awards. The court held that the suit is barred by res judicata as the same claims were already adjudicated in arbitration proceedings under the Arbitration Act, 1940.

26 Sep 2012

The plaintiff, Unique Integrated Transport & Management Consultancies Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL) and its of...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Rules on Arbitration Petition No.846 of 2014 Under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act. The Court Considers Whether the Arbitral Award Dated 22 March 2014 Should Be Set Aside in Light of Various Share Sale Agreements Between the Parties.

24 Apr 2015

The matter before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay arose from an arbitration petition filed by Haresh Advani under Section 34 of the Arbitration...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)