Search Results for "occupancy"

616 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 616 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal in Land Tribunal Case — Occupancy Rights Upheld for Deceased Applicant's Legal Heirs. Delay Condoned and Order of Single Judge Set Aside as Land Tribunal's Grant of Occupancy Rights Was Final and Conclusive Under Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

The case pertains to a writ appeal filed by Gudde Ningappa (since deceased, represented by his legal heir Manchappa) against an order dated 17.04.2025...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 4987 OF 2022

The petitioners, landowners from village Vhanur, Taluka Kagal, District Kolhapur, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recovery from Pension for Alleged Overstay in Corporation Premises. Recovery of Accommodation Charges Without Notice and Opportunity Violates Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Smt. Shilpa Liladhar Tayare, a former employee of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), retired as Chief Inspector (Enqu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction as Not Maintainable Due to Personal Interest and Availability of Alternative Remedy. Petitioner failed to disclose pendency of civil suit and lacked bona fide public interest, making PIL an abuse of process.

The petitioner, Sharad Nago Chinawale, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking to Restrain CIDCO from Enforcing Contractual Stipulation. Writ jurisdiction cannot be invoked to prevent a party to an agreement from insisting upon a contractual term.

The petitioner, M/s G.D.C. Buildcon Pvt Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Tribunal Order Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioner failed to explain 31-year delay in challenging occupancy rights granted to respondent under Karnataka Land Reforms Act.

The petitioner, Upendra Nayak, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Ban...