NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2486 OF 2005
30 Nov 2005The suit was filed by shareholders of Spice Jet Ltd, a domestic airline company formerly known as Modi Luft, which had undergone several ownership cha...
Search Results for "jurisdiction concession"
1108 result(s) found
Found 1108 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Royalty on Run-of-Mine Coal for Period Prior to Insertion of Rule 64B and 64C in Mineral Concession Rules, 1960. Processed or Beneficiated Coal Attracts Royalty After Effective Date of Notification Dated 25th September, 2000.
31 Jul 2026The dispute involved multiple appeals before the Supreme Court arising out of conflicting interpretations of the stage at which royalty becomes payabl...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Reserved Judgment in Writ Petitions Challenging Fee Notification for FL-III Liquor Licenses Amid COVID-19 Restrictions. Hotel associations and operators contested the validity of the 28 January 2021 notification increasing license fees under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and Rules, seeking reduction or installment facilities due to pandemic-related operating restrictions.
29 Mar 2022The Bombay High Court heard two writ petitions filed by hotel associations and individual operators holding FL-III licenses for vending foreign liquor...
- 18
High Court
Somanahalli Toll Plaza Case: Karnataka High Court Protects Local Residents from Daily Toll Charges.
28 Jan 2026The Karnataka High Court partly allowed a writ petition filed by residents of Somanahalli, Nelaguli and Kaggalipura villages challen...
- 155
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Inquiry Officer's Penalty Order for Lack of Jurisdiction in Misdescription of Cargo Case. Container Corporation of India's Inquiry Officer acted without authority under the Indian Railways Act, 1989 and the Railways (Punitive Charges for Misdescription of Goods) Rules, 2004.
20 Feb 2015The case involves two writ petitions arising from an order dated 10.09.2012 passed by an Inquiry Officer, Shri Srinivas Mudgerikar, appointed by the H...
- 88
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Modifies Condition for Release of Seized Vehicle in KMMC Rules Case — Bank Guarantee Reduced to Simple Bond. The court held that Rule 43(8) of the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994 is directory and the condition of bank guarantee can be substituted with a simple bond to avoid hardship to the owner.
15 Apr 2019The petitioner, Mallappa s/o Mayappa Idali, is the owner of a vehicle seized in connection with an offence under the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concessio...
- 149
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Dispute — ICA's Substitution of State's Nominee Arbitrator Held Unjustified. Section 15(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Requires Substitute Arbitrator to Be Appointed Per Original Procedure; Former Employee Not Disqualified Per Se.
3 Jan 2019The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Government of Haryana against the order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which had dismissed th...
- 215
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses PIL Challenging State's Interpretation of Supreme Court Order Allowing Post-Deadline Transportation. The Petitioner Contends That the Supreme Court's Order Under Article 142 Permitted Only Excavation Till 15 March 2018 and Not Post-Deadline Transportation.
4 May 2018The Goa Foundation, a public interest organization, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the State Government's decisi...
- 43
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Trademark Infringement Cases for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Court holds that mere existence of a website accessible in Mumbai does not confer jurisdiction under Section 134 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 unless the plaintiff has a business or resides within the court's limits.
30 Nov -0001The judgment involves two appeals (Appeal No.340 of 2015 and Appeal No.95 of 2015) heard together by the Bombay High Court. In the first appeal, the a...
- 104
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award on Termination and Repudiation of Master Asset Purchase Agreement. Arbitrator's Finding of Repudiation by Purchaser and Direction for Refund of Consideration under MAPA Considered.
10 May 2013The dispute arose from a Master Asset Purchase Agreement (MAPA) dated 31st March 2005 between Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt. Ltd. as purchaser and V Hote...
- 24
