Search Results for "frivolous litigation"

477 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 477 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses PIL Based on Unverified WhatsApp Video as Abuse of Process. Court holds that a public interest litigation founded on a viral video without independent verification or credible material amounts to an abuse of the process of law and cannot be entertained.

The petitioner, Luhar Jayantibhai Jugabhai, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Gujarat High Court alleging illegal demolition of a building...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal to Enforce English Summary Judgment in Guarantee Dispute — Foreign Judgment Held Unenforceable for Violating Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 13 CPC. Summary judgment passed after denying leave to defend is not conclusive and cannot be enforced in India.

The dispute arose from a Share Purchase and Co-operation Agreement (SPCA) executed on 12.05.1995 between (appellant, a foreign company) and (responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Trust Property Dispute — Order of Temporary Injunction Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Order 39 Rule 3 CPC. Court holds that ex-parte injunction granted without recording reasons or issuing notice is unsustainable.

The appellants, who were defendants in a suit filed by the respondent trust, challenged an ex-parte ad-interim order of temporary injunction granted b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition by Father for Custody of Minor Daughter from Mother — Custody Dispute Between Parents Not Maintainable as Habeas Corpus When Child is in Mother's Custody and Not Illegally Detained.

The petitioner, Gaurav Raj Jain, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging BCCI's Amendment Excluding IPL and CLT20 from Conflict of Interest Regulations. The court held that the amendment was a valid policy decision by a private body and not subject to judicial review unless it violates statutory provisions or fundamental rights.

The petitioner, Cricket Association of Bihar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the amendment to Regulation 6.2.4 of the BCCI Regul...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Against National Sports Club of India Construction, Upholding Environmental and Municipal Permissions. Court finds no violation of CRZ or heritage regulations and rejects allegations of illegal construction as motivated by private interests.

The petitioner, Society for Promotion of Equality, Awareness and Rights (SPEAR), filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court seeki...