Search Results for "execution dismissal default"

672 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 672 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Decree Holder's Execution and Sets Aside Condition of Deposit in Cooperative Court Award Execution. Court holds that a third party not bound by the award cannot be directed to deposit occupation charges as a condition for stay of execution.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising from the same order of the District Court. The decree holder (Mangala Keshav Gavhale) obtained an awa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Execution of Foreign Court's Costs Order. Foreign judgment imposing costs is a decree enforceable under Section 44A of CPC, 1908, and the executing court cannot go behind the decree.

The Petitioner, M/s. Alcon Electronics Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 15th April, 2011 passed by the learned District Judge-2, Nashik, which rej...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Dismissal of Execution Application for Arbitral Award on Limitation Grounds. Execution of Arbitral Award is Governed by Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963, Not Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Ltd., had granted a loan of Rs.3,95,000 to respondent No.1 for purchasing a tractor, with respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Execution of Specific Performance Decree Despite Delay in Deposit of Balance Sale Consideration. Doctrine of Merger Applies When Appellate Court Confirms Trial Court Decree Without Modifying Time Limit.

The appellant, Surinder Pal Soni, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 8 December 2003 for agricultural land in Panchku...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Delay Condonation Application in Civil Suit — 228-Day Delay Not Sufficiently Explained. The court upheld the trial court's finding that the explanation for delay was vague and unsupported by evidence, declining to interfere under Article 227.

The petitioners, plaintiffs in a civil suit, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order d...