Search Results for "discontinuance"

190 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 190 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes State Transport Appellate Tribunal Order in Motor Vehicles Act Case — Lack of Jurisdiction to Review Own Orders. The Tribunal cannot review its own orders under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, as no power of review is conferred by the Act or Rules.

The petitioners, who are private bus operators, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Maintainability Challenge and Upholds RERA Recovery Certificate in Allottee Refund Case. Real Estate Regulatory Authority Has Power to Issue Recovery Certificate Under Section 40(1) of RERA Act, 2016 for Refund Orders.

The judgment pertains to two connected matters: an Interim Application filed by the developer, Marvel Sigma Homes Pvt. Ltd., challenging the maintaina...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru considers batch of income tax appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging ITAT orders for assessment years 2001-02 to 2004-05. Assessee and Revenue both seek to set aside the ITAT decisions and frame substantial questions of law.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru dealt with a batch of income tax appeals filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeals a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in MRTP Act Case — Notice Under Section 53(1) Challenged as Nullity for Shortfall in Statutory Period. Bar Under Section 149 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Does Not Apply When Notice Itself Is Invalid for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Period.

The appellant, Kishor S/o Ramalu @ Rambhau Telang, was the original plaintiff who received a notice dated 18.11.2010 under Section 53(1) of the Mahara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MODVAT Credit Denial Under Rule 57C of Central Excise Rules, 1944. Inputs Used in Manufacture of Exempted Final Products Not Eligible for Credit.

The petitioners, Atlas Automotive Components Private Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Order VIII Rule 6A CPC Mandatory for Filing Counterclaim Before Written Statement. Counterclaim Filed After Written Statement Is Not Permissible as Provision Imposes Embargo on Belated Filing.

The Supreme Court of India, in a three-judge bench, addressed a reference regarding the interpretation of Order VIII Rule 6A of the Code of Civil Proc...