Search Results for "composite property"

431 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 431 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

GST on Advances for Future Supplies: Examining Constitutional Validity. Evaluating GST's application to unutilized advances and its constitutionality.

The L&T IHI Consortium, a collaboration between Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (L&T) and IHI Infrastructure Systems Co. Ltd., Japan, challenged the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of Lessor in Rent Control Exclusion Case. Company That Lost Rent Control Protection Due to High Paid-Up Share Capital Cannot Regain It by Subsequent Reduction.

The case involves a dispute between M/s. Depe Global Shipping Agencies Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff/Lessor) and M/s. Mather and Platt (India) Ltd. (Defendant/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiffs' Suit for License Fee and Compensation, Allows Defendant's Counter-Claim for Losses Due to Suppression of No Development Zone Status. Plaintiffs held liable for fraudulent misrepresentation regarding land use, entitling Defendant to damages for demolished tower.

The plaintiffs, owners of a larger property in Madh, Malad, Mumbai, entered into a leave and license agreement with the defendant, a telecom company, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Judgment in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Non-Compliance and Limitation. Bank's Auction Sale Upheld as Borrower's Challenge Was Time-Barred and Requests Did Not Trigger Statutory Obligations Under Section 13(3A) of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The dispute arose from proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SAR...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partnership Act Bar Case — Agreement Held as Licence Not Lease. Suit for Eviction by Unregistered Partnership Firm Not Barred Under Section 69(2) of Indian Partnership Act, 1932 as Right to Evict Trespasser Arises from Common Law.

The case involves a second appeal filed by M/s Hotel Satkar, an unregistered partnership firm, against the dismissal of their suit for eviction of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Third Party Claim in Execution Proceedings — ING Bank N.V. Fails to Prove Ownership of Attached Flat. Claim under Section 47 CPC and Order XXI Rules 58 and 64 rejected as bank did not establish that the flat was not owned by judgment debtor.

The case involves a Chamber Summons taken out by ING Bank N.V., a third party, under Section 47 read with Order XXI Rules 58 and 64 of the Code of Civ...