Search Results for "central sales tax"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "central sales tax"

1002 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1002 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Taxability of Solatium Component in Land Acquisition Compensation Under GST. Issue Concerns Whether Receipt of Solatium Constitutes a Service Under Entry 5(e) of Schedule II to CGST Act, 2017 or Falls Under Exempt Transfer of Land.

10 Sep 2024

The case comprised a batch of five writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Th...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeals of Travel Agencies in Service Tax Export Case — Services Rendered to Foreign Clients Abroad Constitute Export of Service Under Finance Act, 1994. Extended Period of Limitation Under Section 73 of Finance Act, 1994 Cannot Be Invoked Without Suppression or Fraud.

19 Jan 2026

The Madras High Court allowed two appeals filed by M/s. Translanka Air Travels Pvt Ltd and M/s. ETA Travel Agency Pvt Ltd against orders of the Custom...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Classification of Non-Ferrous Metal Castings as Ingots Under Entry C-I-29 of Schedule C to Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. The court held that aluminum castings manufactured by the respondent are covered by the entry for non-ferrous metal ingots, rejecting the Revenue's contention that they are distinct products.

30 Oct 2015

The case involves a Sales Tax Reference under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from a dispute between the Commissioner of Sales T...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Whether Rigid Frame Columns Are Steel Structurals Classifiable Under Section 14(iv)(v) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and Schedule Entry C-55(v) of Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002. The Court examines the classification of pre-fabricated building components and the interpretation of 'steel structurals' in commercial parlance.

23 Dec 2016

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeals in VAT Input Tax Credit Dispute — Rule 21(8) of Punjab VAT Rules Valid Despite Absence of Specific Enabling Provision in Parent Act at Time of Introduction. Input Tax Credit is a Facility, Not a Vested Right; State Can Restrict ITC on Stock-in-Trade to Reduced Tax Rate.

4 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the State of Punjab against a High Court judgment that had struck down Rule 21(8) of the Punjab Value Added Ta...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Sales Tax Officer, Jabalpur in Reassessment Limitation Case. Reassessment Notice Under MP General Sales Tax Act, 1958 Held Time-Barred as Proviso to Section 19(1) Preserved Limitation Period of Three Years Under Repealed Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947.

11 Oct 1966

The dispute arose from reassessment proceedings initiated under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958, which had repealed the Central Provinc...

High Court

Bombay High Court examines maintainability and delay condonation in appeals filed by State under Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. The dispute pertained to taxation of kerosene used as feedstock and returned stream after extraction of N-Paraffin under an agreement between Reliance Industries Limited and Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited.

22 Mar 2018

The matter involved a batch of petitions challenging orders of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Reliance Indus...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.388 OF 2016

19 Dec 2016

The petitioners, a company importing and supplying ATMs to State Bank of India, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challengin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Commissioner's Appeal in VAT Classification Dispute — Nutritional Supplements Classified as Food Preparations at 5% Tax. The Court upheld the Tribunal's classification under Schedule Entry C-107(11)(g) of the MVAT Act, 2002, rejecting the Commissioner's attempt to reclassify the products as medicaments.

6 May 2016

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Maharashtra State, under Section 27 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Sales Tax Notices Against Axis Bank in Liquidation Proceeding — No Liability for Tax Deducted at Source Under MVAT Act After Company's Winding Up. The Court held that the State cannot recover tax from a secured creditor who had no obligation to deduct tax at source under Section 42 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, as the deduction obligation arises only when payment is made to the dealer, and after winding up, the Official Liquidator is the proper authority.

7 Mar 2017

The petitioner, Axis Bank Ltd., a banking company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court s...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)