Search Results for "belated reply"

534 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 534 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Arbitration Case Upholding Arbitral Award. Challenge to Tribunal's Constitution Fails as 30-Day Appointment Period in Arbitration Agreement is Directory, Not Mandatory, Under Sections 16, 34, and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The dispute originated from a consultancy agreement dated 18 September 1995 between the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) and Respondent ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award as Time-Barred Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Application for Correction of Clerical Error Does Not Extend Limitation Period for Challenging Award.

The petitioners, Dr. Writer's Food Products Pvt. Ltd. and two individuals, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Order as Violative of Service Rules and Natural Justice. Transfer of Regional Manager to Mumbai set aside for non-compliance with Section 25 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and breach of principles of natural justice.

The petitioner, Ramesh Janardhan Meshram, a retired Regional Manager of Lokshahir Annabhau Sathe Development Corporation, challenged his transfer orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Students' Petitions Challenging Debarment from Examination Due to Lack of Opportunity of Hearing. Debarment Order Violates Principles of Natural Justice as Students Were Not Given a Chance to Explain Before Being Barred from Appearing in Exams.

The petitioners, students of Mukesh Patel School of Technology, Management and Engineering (Respondent No.2), which is managed by Shri Vile Parle Kelw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Advertising Contract Dispute — Petitioner's Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Fails. Court Held That Arbitrator's Findings on Breach and Quantum Were Not Patently Illegal or Against Public Policy.

The petitioner, M/s Maneesh Pharmaceuticals Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Confirmation of Share Transfer in Wound-Up Company Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Evidence. Section 536(2) of Companies Act, 1956 requires timely application and proof of bona fide transfer before winding up order.

The appellant, Rathnam P.V., filed an appeal against the order of the Company Judge dismissing his application under Section 536(2) of the Companies A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Premature Retirement of Deputy Director of Health Services. The court upheld the constitutional validity of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 and found the premature retirement order valid based on adverse entries and public interest.

The petitioner, Dr. Mrs. Pratibha Gulhane, a retired Deputy Director of Health Services, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Const...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Amendment in Commercial IP Suit Due to Delay and Lack of Due Diligence. Amendment After Commencement of Trial Not Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC as Plaintiffs Failed to Show They Could Not Have Raised the Matter Earlier.

The present Interim Application No. 752 of 2024 was filed by the original plaintiffs, Ramnish Verma and Finesse Fashions Pvt. Ltd., in a pending Comme...