Search Results for "associate company"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "associate company"

708 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 708 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Company's Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order for Property Linked to Narcotics Trafficking. Burden of Proof Under Section 7 SAFEMA Not Discharged by Claimant.

24 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Imperial Exim (India) Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 31 March 2011 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property, New ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Declines to Interfere in Tender Award for Ash Handling Plant; Holds Scope of Judicial Review Limited and Finds No Arbitrariness in Awarding Contract to Lowest Bidder Consortium Despite Office Memorandum Barring Chinese Companies.

2 Nov 2022

The writ petition was filed by Macawber Beekay Pvt. Ltd. challenging the notice inviting tender dated 24.06.2022 and the consequent letter of intent i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Challenging the Majority Arbitral Award's Decision on Quantum of Construction Costs. Petitioner, Claimant in Development Dispute, Asserts That Majority Award Erred in Awarding Cost at Rs.775 per sq.ft. Instead of Actual Cost of Rs.7.26 Crores and Failed to Grant Interest and Costs.

3 Jun 2019

The matter originated from a development agreement dated 29 October 1993 between the petitioner, Caprihans India Limited, and the respondent, Hindoost...

High Court

COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 350 OF 2017

28 Jan 2020

The case concerns two petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 14 February ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Banning Order Issued by Public Sector Undertaking – Allegations of Blacklisting Without Proper Notice and Violation of Fundamental Rights. Petitioner Contends That Show Cause Notice Did Not Specify Intention to Ban for Three Years, Rendering Order Arbitrary.

27 Oct 2016

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a private limited company engaged in corrosion resistant coating applica...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Society's Possession Claim in Tenant Copartnership Housing Society Dispute — Transfer of Flat Without Consent Invalid Under Bye-Laws and Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The court held that the petitioner, claiming through an invalid transfer, is in illegal occupation and liable to be evicted.

7 Jul 2015

The writ petition was filed by Tedco Exports Pvt. Ltd. challenging the order of the Maharashtra State Cooperative Appellate Court which allowed the ap...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeal Against High Court's Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Dispute Involves Interpretation of Contractual Notice Requirement as Condition Precedent and Applicability of Waiver and Estoppel in EPC Contract.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute arose from multiple Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) agreements between SEPCO Electric Power Construction Corporation (con...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 34 Petition Concerning Forfeiture of Bid Securities in Tender Process. The Petition Questions Whether the Arbitrator Correctly Interpreted Clause 19.6 of the Tender Instructions and the Law on Bank Guarantees.

4 Feb 2015

The dispute arose out of a tender process floated by the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited for supply, construction, and comm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Upholds Award as Not Suffering from Patent Illegality or Being Against Public Policy, Refusing to Reappreciate Evidence.

31 Aug 2012

The petitioner, Angel Capital & Debt Market Limited, a stock broker, challenged an arbitral award dated 16 May 2009 under Section 34 of the Arbitratio...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, in a PIL filed by a trade union of airport employees, pronounced an order on 14-09-2021, examining the legality of the privatisation of Mangaluru International Airport under the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994. The court considered allegations that the concession agreement with Adani Enterprises Limited violated Sections 12, 12A, and 21 of the Act, and that the bidding process lacked transparency.

14 Sep 2021

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by the Airports Authority Employees Union, a registered trade ...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)