Search Results for "arbitration challenge"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "arbitration challenge"

1863 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1863 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MSMED Act Arbitral Award on Limitation and Territorial Jurisdiction. Court holds that limitation for arbitration under Section 18 of MSMED Act is governed by Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963, and that the court where the arbitration is held has exclusive jurisdiction under Section 42 of Arbitration Act.

27 Jan 2023

The petitioner, Gammon Engineers & Contractors Pvt. Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 24 September 2020 passed by the Facilitation Council unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Arbitration Reference and Anti-Suit Injunction in Wind Turbine Technology Licensing Dispute. The Core Issue Revolves Around Whether an Unincorporated IPLA Constitutes a Binding Arbitration Agreement Under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

5 Oct 2012

The dispute arose from a joint venture between Enercon (India) Ltd. and its directors (Petitioners) and Enercon GmbH and Wobben Properties GmbH (Respo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Jurisdiction Dispute, Holds Ahmedabad Courts Competent for Section 34 Petition. Mutual Consent to Shift Venue to Ahmedabad Established Seat There, Granting Exclusive Jurisdiction Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Overriding Original Clause Designating Rajasthan Courts.

13 Apr 2021

The appeal arose from a dispute over jurisdiction for a Section 34 petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The appellant, Inox Rene...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Ex-Parte Arbitral Award in Loan Recovery Dispute. Court holds that non-participation in arbitration despite notice and failure to prove fraud or bias does not warrant setting aside award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Jun 2013

The petitioners, The Loot (India) Pvt. Ltd. and its directors, were borrowers and guarantors who had taken a loan from Reliance Capital Limited (the f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Loan Dispute. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Due to Respondent's Failure to Appoint Arbitrator.

10 Oct 2025

The applicant, Mangal Credit and Fincorp Limited, a public limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed an application under Sect...

High Court

Bombay High Court Refuses to Substitute Sole Arbitrator in Arbitration Mandate Extension Petitions Under Section 29-A of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Allegations of Bias and Delay Based on Adverse Rulings in Related IHFL Arbitration Found Insufficient to Justify Drastic Substitution.

23 Apr 2025

The judgment concerned two arbitration petitions filed under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Indiabulls Infraestate Ltd....

High Court

High Court Considers Whether Arbitrator Has Jurisdiction to Pass Successive Awards and Whether Claims Are Barred by Res Judicata. Challenge to Awards Confirmed by Lower Court Raises Issues of Functus Officio and Splitting of Claims under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

27 Sep 2024

The appeals arose from two arbitration awards passed by the sole arbitrator in disputes between Mysore Lamp Works Limited (appellant) and S.V. Enginee...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Legal Heirs in Consent Award Dispute Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Arbitrator Lacked Jurisdiction to Determine Settlement Without All Parties' Request. Consent Awards Set Aside as Sections 30 and 32 of the Act Mandate Joint Request by All Parties for Recording Settlement, Distinguishing from Civil Court Compromise Procedure.

13 Oct 2017

The dispute involved a family property arbitration among the legal heirs of Abdullabhai, concerning properties of firms M/s Abdullabhai Fiddali and Co...

High Court

ARBITRATION PETITION NO.549 OF 2013

9 Jun 2017

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Transport Agreement Dispute Despite Alleged Settlement. Arbitration clause survives termination of contract and disputes regarding compensation are arbitrable under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Oct 2010

The applicant, United Shippers Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)