Search Results for "arbitration and conciliation act 1996"

2212 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2212 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in International Commercial Arbitration Dispute — Seat of Arbitration Determined as Hong Kong Based on Clause 17.2 of MoU.

The petitioner, Mankastu Impex Private Limited, an Indian company, and the respondent, Airvisual Limited, a Hong Kong company, entered into a Memorand...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses/Allows Appeals Against Interim Orders Restraining LCIA Arbitration in Convertible Debentures Dispute. Court Examines Whether Civil Suit to Restrain Arbitration is Maintainable Under Section 5 of Arbitration Act and Interprets Arbitration Clause.

The litigation arises from a dispute over a Compulsorily Convertible Debentures Subscription and Securities Holders Agreement dated 21.06.2013 between...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Arbitration Reference and Anti-Suit Injunction in Wind Turbine Technology Licensing Dispute. The Core Issue Revolves Around Whether an Unincorporated IPLA Constitutes a Binding Arbitration Agreement Under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The dispute arose from a joint venture between Enercon (India) Ltd. and its directors (Petitioners) and Enercon GmbH and Wobben Properties GmbH (Respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Government of Israel in Commercial Lease Dispute. Arbitrator's Rejection of Set-Off and Counter-Claim as Time-Barred Upheld as Not Patently Illegal.

The petitioner, Earnest Business Services Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Earlier Refusal to Extend Mandate Under Section 29A of Arbitration Act — Refusal to Extend Mandate Does Not Terminate Arbitral Proceedings or Bar Fresh Appointment Under Section 11.

The case involves a dispute arising out of a Deed of Assignment of Development Rights dated 6 December 2010 between the applicants (Nalin Vallabhbhai ...