Search Results for "aggravated"

396 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 396 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in POCSO Case Due to Suppression of Material Facts and Failure to Consider Gravity of Offence -- High Court's Bail Order Set Aside as Perverse and Unjustified

The Supreme Court allowed the criminal appeal challenging the High Court's bail order in a case involving serious sexual offences against a minor -- T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Prosecution Failed to Prove Offences Under Sections 366A and 376 IPC Beyond Reasonable Doubt as Victim's Testimony Was Unreliable and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Allegations.

The appellant, Kadamban, was convicted by the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Tumkur, in S.C. No. 274/2012 for offences under Sections 366A (kidn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses KSRTC Appeal and Partly Allows Claimants' Appeal in Motor Accident Compensation Case — Negligence of Bus Driver Established, Compensation Enhanced for Loss of Dependency and Future Prospects.

The appeals arise from a judgment and award dated 17-03-2011 passed by the Additional MACT, Saundatti in MVC No. 897/2010. The claimants, Haseem and S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused in POCSO Case Due to Age Discrepancy and Consensual Relationship. The court held that at the bail stage, a prima facie case is to be seen, and since the victim supported the accused and age was disputed, bail was granted under Section 439 CrPC.

The petitioner, Arvind Kumar K.S., accused No.1, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking ba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Defamation Suit Against Azim Premji for Lack of Authority to File on Behalf of Company. Managing Director's Authority to Sue Required Board Resolution as per Articles of Association.

The suit was filed by Subhiksha Trading Services Ltd. (Plaintiff No.1) and its Managing Director R. Subramanian (Plaintiff No.2) against Azim Premji a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in House Trespass Case Due to Unreliable Sole Witness. Conviction under Section 452 IPC set aside as the sole eyewitness's testimony was inconsistent and the prosecution failed to prove the offence beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dinesh Chandrikaprasad Phatak, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Palghar under Section 452 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860...