Search Results for "State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission"

297 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 297 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Electricity Board's Appeal in Monthly Minimum Charges Dispute — Remands to Civil Court for Factual Adjudication. Disputed facts regarding readiness to avail HT supply require trial, not writ jurisdiction under Article 226.

The case involves two writ appeals filed by the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board against a common order dated 25.07.2022 in W.P.Nos.36209 of 2007 and 2355...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Appeal in Consumer Dispute Against Army Welfare Housing Organization for Non-Compliance of State Commission Order. Refund of ₹56,90,577 with 9% Interest Ordered Due to Failure to Furnish Required Documents.

The case pertains to a consumer dispute where Lt. Col. Sarfraz Singh (appellant) filed a complaint against Army Welfare Housing Organization & Anr. (r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging State Commission's Direction to Register Revision as Appeal in Consumer Dispute — Section 47(1)(b) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 Does Not Permit Revision Against Final Order of District Commission; Appeal is the Appropriate Remedy.

The petitioner, Harish Ramesh Gawai, a director of Laxmi Swapnapurti Planners & Developers Private Limited, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Additional Evidence in Consumer Dispute Over Occupancy Certificate and Conveyance Deed. The Court held that documents coming into existence after the appeal must be considered under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC if relevant and not producible earlier despite due diligence.

The present civil appeal arose from a consumer dispute between the appellants (developers) and the respondent (cooperative housing society). The appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Housing Society and Members Against Builder and Flat Owners in Suit for Declaration and Injunction. Court Holds That Dispute Over Construction of Additional Floors and Common Amenities Is Not Maintainable Without Proper Evidence of Title and Breach of Contract.

The appellants, Shangrilla Apartments Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. and its members, filed a suit (Special Civil Suit No.130/2000) before the Civil Judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Petition Against Rejection of Leave to Join Liquidator in Consumer Complaint. Section 107 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 does not require notice to Liquidator before granting leave to sue.

The petitioner, Akola Municipal Corporation, had deposited Rs. 1,31,00,000 with the respondent no.1 Bank in a fixed deposit for 31 days at 9.5% intere...