Search Results for "Slum Redevelopment"

289 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 289 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Protection of Stall in Slum Area — Petitioner Failed to Establish Possession Prior to Cut-off Date of 1.1.1995. Land Belonging to MHADA Vests in Slum Rehabilitation Authority Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Shriniwas Krishna Suvarna, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking protection for his stall located on land belongi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Tenants Against Eviction Orders in Redevelopment Dispute — Held That Tenants Cannot Be Evicted Without Proper Rehabilitation Under MHADA and Cooperative Housing Society Bye-Laws.

The judgment pertains to a group of appeals filed by tenants (Pramod Jamnadas Gokani, Upendra Lallubhai Shah, Priti Pramod Gokani, and Kamlesh Jayant ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Slum Declaration — Landowners' Appeal Rejected as Time-Barred Under Section 4 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971. Declaration of land as slum upheld as appeal filed after 22 years was grossly delayed and no sufficient cause shown.

The petitioners, owners of land bearing Survey No.51 in Ward No.19 of Municipal Council, Yavatmal, challenged the order dated 4/5/2010 passed by the P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging MHADA's Land Allotment for Housing Society Redevelopment Under MHADA Act, 1976. Court upholds MHADA's power to allot land and rejects allegations of illegality and lack of locus standi.

The judgment pertains to two petitions, Writ Petition No. 3 of 2013 filed by Shreeprakash Ramganesh Dube and Public Interest Litigation No. 27 of 2013...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Eviction Orders in SRA Rehabilitation Scheme — Petitioner Failed to Prove Eligibility as Original Tenant or Purchaser of Alternate Room. Concurrent Findings of Fact by Deputy Collector and Apex Grievance Redressal Committee Upheld as Not Perverse.

The Petitioner, Prakash Bandu Jadyal, filed two writ petitions challenging orders dated 15.03.2021 passed by Respondent No.2 (Deputy Collector, Mumbai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MHADA Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute. Court upholds MHADA's order directing petitioners to vacate and hand over possession of chawl rooms for redevelopment under Section 95A of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976.

The petitioners, who are residents of Mohamed Tajbhai Chawl in Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengin...