High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Hears Writ Appeal by Government Survey Employees. Appeal Pertains to Service Dispute Arising from Single Judge Order in WA No. 1267 of 2014 (S-RES).
30 May 2024...
Search Results for "Section 38(3)"
516 result(s) found
Found 516 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Charge Sheet in Money Lending Dispute Due to Civil Nature of Transaction. Sections 384, 420, 506 IPC Not Attracted as Dispute Pertains to Loan Repayment and Not Criminal Extortion or Cheating.
12 Jan 2024The petitioner, Sathish Kumar S, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) before the High Court o...
- 118
High Court
High Court Rules on Unlawful Subletting: Transfer of Tenancy Disguised as Business Sale Invalid. Court highlights the misuse of tenancy rights and emphasizes protection of landlords under Bombay Rent Act.
7 Oct 2024The Bombay High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, legal heirs, in a long-standing eviction dispute regarding unlawful subletting of commercial p...
- 498
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Possession and Title. Court holds that admission of storage of rubble by defendants does not negate plaintiffs' possession of eastern side of suit property.
18 Feb 2025The second appeal was filed by original defendant nos. 1 and 2 challenging concurrent judgments and decrees granting declaration of title and injuncti...
- 405
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Extension of Arbitral Mandate Under Section 29-A(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Demise of Arbitrator and Insolvency of Party Held Sufficient Cause for Extension Despite Lack of Consent Under Section 29-A(3).
6 Feb 2025The petitioners, Scape Marketing Private Limited and others, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging...
- 63
High Court
Gujarat High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision in Rent Arrears Case — Tenant Failed to Pay Rent Despite Notice Under Section 12(2) of Bombay Rent Act. Eviction Decree Confirmed as Tenant's Default Attracts Section 12(3)(a) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.
5 Jan 2026The case involves a civil revision application under Section 29(2) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 (the Rent Act)...
- 233
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Execution Proceedings Under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC — Appellant Entitled to Possession Despite Third Party Claimant's Alleged Independent Title. Executing Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Going Behind Decree for Specific Performance; Third Party Must File Separate Suit to Establish Title.
18 Aug 2005The appellant, Sujata Sanzgiry, entered into an agreement for sale dated 5th August 1989 with respondent No.1, Ankush R. Naik, for the purchase of Fla...
- 80
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Confirms Enhanced Compensation for Land and Trees. Reference Court's valuation of Rs.82,500 per hectare upheld as consistent with earlier judgment in connected appeal covering same notification and project.
23 Nov 2017The State of Maharashtra, through the Collector and other officers, filed an appeal under the Land Acquisition Act challenging the judgment of the Ref...
- 44
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Clarifies Armed Forces Disciplinary Powers in Adultery Case - Union of India's Application for Clarification Allowed. The Court held that the decriminalization of adultery under Section 497 IPC does not preclude disciplinary action against military personnel under Sections 45 and 63 of the Army Act, 1950, and similar provisions in other military Acts, as they operate under Article 33 of the Constitution for maintaining discipline.
31 Jan 2023The Supreme Court addressed a miscellaneous application filed by the Union of India seeking clarification of its earlier judgment in Joseph Shine v. U...
- 592
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals and Directs Separate Cut-Off Marks for Persons with Disabilities in Judicial Services Recruitment. The Court held that exclusion of visually impaired candidates from judicial services is unconstitutional and that PwBD candidates are entitled to relaxation of selection criteria under Section 34 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.
10 Mar 2025The Supreme Court of India, in a suo motu writ petition and connected matters, addressed the issue of recruitment of persons with disabilities (PwD) i...
- 930
