Search Results for "Section 37(4)"

843 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 843 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows EPF Recovery Over Bank's Mortgage in Priority Dispute Under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. EPF Dues Have Priority Over Secured Creditors Under Section 11 of EPF Act, 1952.

The case involves three writ appeals arising from orders of a learned Single Judge in W.P.Nos.15582 of 2010 and 8686 of 2010 dated 21.06.2011. The app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ashok, was convicted by the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Shimoga, sitting at Bhadravathi, in Sessions Case No.94/2015 for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 302 and 324 IPC set aside as prosecution witnesses turned hostile and medical evidence did not corroborate the alleged assault.

The appellant, Sri Muniraju, was convicted by the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kolar (sitting at KGF) in Sessions Case No.147/2016 for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in NDPS Act Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Search and Seizure Procedures. Failure to Join Independent Witnesses and Non-Production of Seized Contraband Before Court Renders Conviction Unsustainable Under Section 20(b) of NDPS Act, 1985.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by Mustaq Ahamed alias Maamu and Siraj Basha alias Siraj alias Gunda against the judgment of conviction a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Wrongful Confinement Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 366 and 342 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Obalesha @ Ranga, was convicted by the Fast Track Sessions Court-XVI, Bangalore City, in S.C.No.305/2011 for offences under Sections 36...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Municipal Corporation's Demolition Notice Under Section 55 of MRTP Act — Appellant's Possession Based on Census Certificate and Prior Withdrawal of Notice Under Section 354A of MMC Act Entitled to Interim Protection.

The appellant, Anil Sitaram Dubey, filed an appeal against an order of the City Civil Court, Mumbai, dated 26 September 2016, which refused to grant a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Orders on Territorial Jurisdiction and Interim Relief. Held that DRT Ahmedabad had jurisdiction to entertain the bank's recovery application and that the Appellate Tribunal's refusal to grant interim relief was justified.

The petitioner, M/s. GTCL Mobile-Com Technology Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, challenged two orders: (1) an order dated 14-11...