Search Results for "Section 28(1)"

585 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 585 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Transfer of Winding Up Petition to NCLT Despite Admission Order. Discretion Under Section 434(1)(c) Companies Act, 2013 Properly Exercised Where Liquidation Was at Initial Stage and No Irreversible Steps Taken.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by Action Ispat and Power Pvt. Ltd. against the Delhi High Court's order transferring a winding up petition to the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Act Possession Notice — Bank Directed to Consider One-Time Settlement Offer. Failure to Consider OTS Proposal Before Taking Possession Violates Principles of Fairness and Natural Justice Under Section 13(2) of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The petitioner, Surendra Nikose, had availed a housing loan from the State Bank of India (respondent). Due to financial difficulties, he defaulted on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Manufacturer's Appeal in Rebate Claim Case Due to Limitation Under Section 11B of Central Excise Act. Rebate of duty on exports is governed by the limitation period prescribed under Section 11B, as 'refund' includes 'rebate' under Explanation (A) to that section.

The appellant, Sansera Engineering Limited, a manufacturer of excisable goods, exported goods between August 2015 and October 2015 and filed claims fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Upon Challenge to Pre-Deposit Order and Validity of Explanation to Schedule Entry A-45 of MVAT Act, 2002. The Petition Seeks Quashing of Assessment and Pre-Deposit Orders for Pan Masala Containing Tobacco Exemption Denial and Striking Down of Discriminatory Notification.

The petitioner, M/s. Ghodawat Energy Pvt. Ltd., a manufacturer of pan masala with and without tobacco, challenged the levy of VAT on pan masala contai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Labour Court Award in VSS Dispute — NMR Workers Found to Have Been Coerced into Voluntary Separation Scheme. The Court confirmed reinstatement with 70% back-wages under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, finding no perversity in the concurrent findings of fact.

The case arose from a dispute between the General Manager, Electrical Rengali Hydro Electric Project, Orissa (appellant) and 90 NMR workers (responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Merger Control Disclosure Obligations and Limits of CCI's Powers After Approval. The Court Emphasizes That CCI's Authority Must Be Traced to the Act and That Disclosure Must Present the Transaction in Substance.

The case arises from an appeal under Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002, filed by Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC before the Supreme Court...