Search Results for "Section 2(13)"

850 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 850 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in PMLA Default Bail Case — BNSS Proviso Not Retrospective. Complaint Filed Before BNSS Commencement Governed by Old Law; No Default Bail as Complaint Filed Within 60 Days of Arrest.

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal against the Uttarakhand High Court's order rejecting default bail to the appellant, Parvinder Singh, in a money ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka Administrative Tribunal Order in Transport Department Recruitment Dispute. The Petitions Seek to Quash the Tribunal's Order on Grounds of Illegality.

This batch of writ petitions arose from proceedings before the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal (KAT). The petitioners, numerous individuals, challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010422252008_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Recovery of Time-Barred Debts under the Haryana Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1979: Resolving Legal Ambiguities and Clarifying Recovery Mechanisms Navigating the Intersection of Statutes of Limitation and Debt Recovery in India

Recovery of Time-Barred Debts under the Haryana Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1979: Appeals arising from judgments of the High Court of Punja...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.

This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...