Search Results for "Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy"

144 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 144 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in National Highways Act Land Acquisition Cases — Section 3J Not Violative of Article 14. The Court held that the non-grant of solatium and interest under the National Highways Act, 1956 is not discriminatory and the Act is a complete code.

9 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court, in a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India, considered the validity of the non-grant of solatium and interest under the Nati...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in National Highways Act Acquisition Cases — Non-Grant of Solatium and Interest Upheld. The Court held that Section 3J of the National Highways Act, 1956, excluding solatium and interest under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, is not violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

3 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court, in a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India and the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), considered the validity of t...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dharwad Bench Hears Writ Petition by Concessionaire Challenging NOC for Access to Retail Outlet on BOT Highway. Key Legal Question is Whether Concessionaire’s Statutory and Contractual Rights to Control Access Override Highway Administration’s Power to Grant Access Permissions Under Section 8A of National Highways Act, 1956.

24 Oct 2017

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by Nandi Highway Developers Ltd (the concessionaire) challenging a no-objection certificate (NOC) dated 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Crop Pattern Changes in Gunjawani Irrigation Project — No Scientific Basis Found for Challenge. Court held that changes in crop pattern approved by State Level Technical Assessment Committee (SLTAC-II) were based on proper data and analysis, and petitioners failed to demonstrate any illegality or arbitrariness.

1 Oct 2019

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by agriculturists from Bhor and Velha Talukas in Pune district, challenging changes in the crop pattern...

High Court

High Court of Bombay hears writ petition filed by State of Maharashtra against multiple respondents including industrial companies and individuals concerning urban development and environmental matters in Mahul Village, Chembur. The case involves allegations of non-compliance with environmental norms and urban development regulations by industrial units and authorities.

1 Jan 1970

The writ petition, being Writ Petition No. 14102 of 2018 along with connected civil application and original side writ petition, was filed by the Stat...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Subsequent Purchaser Cannot Invoke Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act. The Court held that a person who purchases land after the acquisition process is complete has no locus standi to claim lapse of acquisition under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

18 May 2023

The case involves an appeal by the Government of NCT of Delhi against an order of the High Court of Delhi allowing a writ petition filed by the respon...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Structures in Mohili Village. Petitioners failed to establish legal right to occupy public land and structures were found to be illegal encroachments under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

1 Mar 2018

The petitioners, 14 individuals occupying shops and structures in Mohili Village, Sakinaka, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the proposed dem...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Due to Acquisition of Suit Property Under Coal Bearing Areas Act, 1957. The decree for specific performance becomes unexecutable as the property was acquired by the Central Government under the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957.

10 Oct 2022

The present second appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 21/03/1986 concerning agricultural land bearing su...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Public Purpose — Compensation Award Not Challenged on Merits. Petitioners' Challenge to Acquisition Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Fails as They Did Not Seek Reference for Higher Compensation and Acquiesced to Proceedings.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original owner Anwar Hajee Alimohammed Hajee Cassum Agboatwala and other co-owners, filed a writ petition under Ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landowners' Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Compensation and Betterment Charges for CIDCO Metro Project. Court upholds compensation determined under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and rejects waiver of betterment charges under CIDCO Act.

4 Mar 2025

The judgment pertains to a group of five writ petitions filed by landowners whose lands were acquired for the Metro Centre project of CIDCO in Panvel,...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)