Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Filed by Public Trusts and Residents in Ghatkopar. The Petition Concerns Land Use and Alleged Violations Under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950.
30 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "Regularisation Permission"
145 result(s) found
Found 145 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Recall and Review Applications in Bank Loan Assignment Case — Consent Order Recorded on Minutes of Order Cannot Be Unilaterally Recalled. Assignment of Debt and Security by Co-operative Bank to Third Party Under OTS Upheld Despite Subsequent Objections by Liquidator and Suspended Director.
11 Mar 2025The judgment concerns three applications seeking recall or review of an order dated 21 October 2022 passed by the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition N...
- 353
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Revenue Records. Held that Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and Civil Suit Is Appropriate Remedy for Title Disputes.
5 Dec 2023The petitioners, claiming to be owners of certain agricultural lands in Nashik, filed a writ petition challenging a mutation entry made in favor of re...
- 18
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Teacher's Petition for Approval of Appointment and Regularisation in Unaided Junior College. Management's Failure to Submit Proposal Cannot Deprive Teacher of Benefits; Deputy Director Directed to Approve Appointment Within Four Weeks.
11 Jul 2023The petitioner, Vaishali Ukha Patil, was appointed as a full-time Mathematics teacher at Annasaheb Vartak College of Arts, Kedarnath Malhotra College ...
- 11
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Resort Developer Against Prohibition of Construction in Backwater Island. CRZ Notification 1991 Applies to Backwater Islands; No Development Zone Restrictions Upheld.
1 Jan 2020The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by Kapico Kerala Resorts Pvt. Ltd. challenging a Kerala High Court order that prohibited resort construction on Ne...
- 206
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Sarpanch Under Section 14(1)(j-3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — No Evidence of Wilful Omission Causing Loss to Gram Panchayat. Disqualification set aside as Collector failed to record finding of loss and appellate authority dismissed appeal without considering merits.
10 Apr 2019The petitioner, Savita Devidas Adhane, was elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Viramgaon. On 04.08.2018, the District Collector, Aurangabad, disqualifi...
- 62
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Student's Claim for Compensation for Loss of Academic Year Due to College's Irregular Admissions. Petitioner accepted full and final settlement of Rs 20 lakhs, barring further claims under principles of accord and satisfaction.
21 Feb 2019The petitioner, Riya George, a medical student, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking compensation from Kannur Medical Co...
- 199
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Age Limit and Recruitment Interval Rules for Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service. Rules 8(1) and 12 of UPHJS Rules, 1975 Held Valid as Not Manifestly Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 16.
29 Jan 2019The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Rules 8(1) and 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975. The petitioner...
- 246
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Absorption of Grampanchayat Employees as Clerks in Municipal Corporation — Directions Issued for Regularisation of Service. Employees of merged Grampanchayats entitled to absorption in Nanded Waghala Municipal Corporation with continuity of service and pay protection.
14 Aug 2014The petitioners were employees of Grampanchayats Taroda (Kh.) and Taroda (Bk.), which were merged into the Nanded Waghala Municipal Corporation. They ...
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Company Judge's Order Refusing to Set Aside Attachment of Property by Official Liquidator. Held that the Company Court has jurisdiction to decide questions relating to title and possession of property under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956, and the appellants failed to establish their title.
22 Mar 2010The appellants, Laxman Yeswant Prabhudesai, Uday Laxman Prabhudesai, and Gayatri Uday Prabhudesai, filed an appeal under Section 483 of the Companies ...
- 55
