Search Results for "Regular Promotion"

552 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 552 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Departmental Promotion Committee Recommendations in Postal Department Recruitment. Court Holds That Candidates Who Were Not Considered for Promotion Due to Non-Inclusion of Their Names in the Zone of Consideration Must Be Considered Afresh.

The petitioners, a group of 86 individuals employed in various capacities such as Postal Assistant, Sorting Assistant, Postman, and Mail Guard in the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Challenge to MPSC's Refusal to Recommend Candidates for Teacher Posts Due to Age Bar — MPSC's Discretion to Prescribe Age Limit Upheld as Reasonable Classification Under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The State of Maharashtra and its education authorities filed a writ petition challenging the decision of the Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MP...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Direct Recruit Deputy Collectors and State of Uttarakhand in Seniority Dispute. Promotee Deputy Collectors Cannot Claim Seniority from Ad Hoc Appointment Date as Appointments Were Not in Accordance with Rules Under Uttaranchal Civil Services (Executive Branch) Rules, 2005.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of civil appeals arising from a seniority dispute between direct recruit and promotee Deputy Collectors in the State o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Direct Recruit Section Officers' Seniority Over Promotees in Maharashtra Secretariat Service. Seniority to be determined from date of substantive appointment, not from date of ad-hoc promotion.

The case involves four writ petitions filed by direct recruit Section Officers and promotee Section Officers of the Maharashtra Secretariat Service, c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Seniority Determination in Assistant Teacher Cadre. Education Officer's Order Declaring Respondent No.4 as Senior and Entitled to Head Master Post Upheld Under Rule 12 of MEPS Rules, 1981.

The petitioner, Salim Gulab Mulla, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order passed by the Ed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Seniority Determination in Assistant Teacher Cadre — Continuous Service Length Decides Seniority Under Rule 12 of MEPS Rules, 1981. Education Officer's Order Upheld as Respondent No.4 Appointed Earlier, Hence Senior.

The petitioner, Salim Gulab Mulla, and respondent no.4, Sunil Ananta Devkule, were both assistant teachers at New English School, Mandhardeo, run by r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appointment of Chief Medical Officer in Port Trust. Selection and appointment of respondent no.3 as Chief Medical Officer with Mormugao Port Trust upheld as valid under the Recruitment Regulations, 2000.

The petitioner, Dr. Dnyaneshwer Purshottam Kudalkar, a Chief Medical Officer with New Mangalore Port Trust, challenged the selection and appointment o...