Search Results for "Railway accident compensation"

347 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 347 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Railway Claims Tribunal Rejection of Compensation for Untoward Incident. Held that strict proof of boarding train is not required under Section 124-A of Railways Act, 1989 and the claimant's version must be accepted unless rebutted by strong evidence.

The appellant, Nitin Navindas Hundiwala, a 75-year-old consultant, filed a claim for compensation under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989, read ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Deemed Fall from Train as Untoward Incident Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989. Recovery of Valid Monthly Season Ticket from Deceased's Body Establishes Bona Fide Passenger Status, Reversing Tribunal's Finding of Trespass.

The appellants, parents of the deceased Milind Balaram Sakpal, filed a claim for compensation under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, alleging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Deceased a Bona Fide Passenger Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Parents of 18-year-old who fell from train entitled to compensation under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 despite absence of ticket.

The appellants, parents of deceased Prasad Narshima Purohit, filed a claim petition before the Railway Claims Tribunal seeking compensation of Rs.4,00...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Sets Aside Tribunal's Dismissal for Erroneous Application of Res Ipsa Loquitur. Parents and Minor Daughter of Deceased Passenger Who Fell from Train Entitled to Compensation Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, dated 23 January 2019, dismissing the claim application filed by the appella...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Consumer Forum Compensation for Railway Death Due to Negligence in Providing Safe Travel. Railway Administration Held Liable for Death of Passenger Thrown from Train by Miscreants as Deficiency in Service Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The Union of India, through the General Manager of South Central Railway, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the District Consumer Disputes...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Railway Claims Tribunal Order Dismissing Compensation Claim Due to Affidavit Language Issue. Tribunal Directed to Decide Claim on Merits Considering All Evidence and Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 18 of Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987.

The appellant, Shilabai wd/o Raghunath Hemne, lost her husband in a railway accident on 04.10.2002. She filed a claim for compensation under Section 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Deemed Untoward Incident Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989. Deceased's fall from running train held to be an untoward incident, reversing Railway Claims Tribunal's rejection of compensation.

The case involves an appeal by the widow and son of Gautam Kamble, who died after falling from a running train (No. 57548) at Latur Road Railway Stati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Self-Inflicted Injury Not Proved. Deceased was a bonafide passenger; failure to examine witnesses leads to inference of untoward incident under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.

The appeal was filed by the original applicants, Vasanti Parsottam Patel and Mrs. Urvashi Ravi Jugran, challenging the order dated 29 September 2014 o...