Search Results for "Prevention of Corruption Act"

458 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 458 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Uncorroborated Trap Proceedings. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, M.C. Manjunatha, was convicted by the Principal Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Mysore, in Special Case No. 69/2004 for offences puni...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Bawasingh Puransingh Khaira, was convicted by the Special Judge of Greater Bombay in Special Case No. 24/89 under the Prevention of Cor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in MPSC Scam Case on Parity with Co-Accused. Personal Secretary to Minister Entitled to Bail as Co-Accused with Similar Role Already Released by Supreme Court and High Court.

The applicant, Avinash Tukaram Sanas, was accused No.7 in the MPSC Scam case, holding the post of a Class I Officer and Personal Secretary to a Minist...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand for Bribe Not Proved. Acquittal of Head Constable under Section 161 IPC and Section 5(1)(d) read with 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 Upheld Due to Inconsistent Evidence.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 23/3/1990 passed by the Special Judge, Sangli in Special Case No.8 of 1986, whe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Acquittal of Accused Under Section 161 IPC and Section 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1948 Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Establish Essential Ingredients.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 23.7.1990 passed by the Special Judge, Thane, in Special Case No. 9 of 1985, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Special Judge, Pune, acquitting the respondent-accused Madhukar Dharmaji Kale of offence...