Search Results for "Prakash Gupta"

779 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 779 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Contempt Proceedings — Impleadment of Sitting Judge Not Permissible in Suo Motu Contempt. Filing of Scandalous Application Against Judge Constitutes Fresh Contempt and Professional Misconduct.

The appellant,  an advocate, filed Criminal Writ Petition No.1612 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court on behalf of his client seeking a CBI inve...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Bank Account Suit — Plaint Rejected as Barred by Limitation Under Article 113 of Limitation Act, 1963. Exchange of Correspondence Cannot Extend Limitation Once Right to Sue Accrues.

The appellant, Shakti Bhog Food Industries Ltd., filed a civil suit in 2005 against the Central Bank of India and another respondent seeking a decree ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Doctor in Medical Negligence Case — Lack of Expert Opinion and Criminal Intent. Complaint under Section 338 IPC fails as essential ingredients of grievous hurt by rash or negligent act not established without expert evidence.

The petitioner, a practicing ophthalmologist, challenged the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, which upheld the Magistrate's order issu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 seeking to quash CBI FIR for disproportionate assets under Prevention of Corruption Act; the court examined the scope of Section 13 and the effect of investigation delay. Final outcome not available in the provided excerpt.

The writ petition was filed by a sitting MLA and former Minister of Karnataka, who challenged the FIR registered by the Central Bureau of Investigatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...