Search Results for "Mines and Minerals Act 1957"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Mines and Minerals Act 1957"

218 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 218 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Against Revenue Orders in Land Mutation Dispute Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy. Petitioner's challenge to mutation entry and revenue orders dismissed as second round of litigation without exhausting statutory appeal under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code.

22 Jun 2026

The petitioner, IVRCL Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Defines Aravali Hills and Ranges for Conservation in T.N. Godavarman Case. Court adopts scientific definition based on geological and ecological criteria to prevent desertification and protect biodiversity across Delhi, Haryana, Gujarat, and Rajasthan.

20 Nov 2025

The Supreme Court of India, in its inherent jurisdiction under Article 32 of the Constitution, addressed the critical issue of defining 'Aravali Hills...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Petition to Quash FIR Against Bookies for Offences Under Karnataka Police Act and IPC. Allegations Pertain to Unauthorized Collection of Betting Amounts and Tax Evasion Within Bangalore Turf Club Premises.

30 Apr 2024

The High Court of Karnataka heard a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed by twenty-six individuals or entities (th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Penalty and Royalty for Unauthorized Excavation of Earth During Sewerage Pipeline Project. Revenue Officials' Demand Under Section 48(7) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Quashed as Excavation Was Incidental to Public Works Contract and Not for Commercial Use.

28 Mar 2024

The petitioners, M/s. Ramky Infrastructure Ltd. and its shareholder, challenged the imposition of penalty and royalty by revenue officials under Secti...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Rule Permitting Levy of Royalty on Beneficiated Ore at Processing Plant. Clause (b) of Sub-Rule 10 of Rule 4 of Karnataka Prevention of Illegal Mining and Storage of Minerals Rules, 2011 held intra vires the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.

14 Dec 2023

The petitioner, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in mining and beneficiation of iron ore, challenged Clause (b) of Sub-Ru...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Under MPDA Act for Lack of Evidence of Public Order Disturbance. Sand Smuggling and Criminal Acts Do Not Automatically Justify Preventive Detention as They Pertain to Law and Order, Not Public Order.

3 Aug 2020

The petitioner, Baliram s/o Namdeo Bedke, challenged his preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Demand for Royalty on Earth Excavated for Plot Development — Notification Exempting Royalty on Earth Used for Same Plot Development Applies Retrospectively. The court held that the exemption notification dated 5 May 2015 under the Maharashtra Minor Minerals Extraction (Development and Regulation Rules) 2013 applies retrospectively, and the order demanding royalty without hearing violates natural justice.

16 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Agile Real Estate Private Limited, a real estate development company, owned lands at revenue village Balkum in Thane district, includi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty for Excavation of Earth Without Permission in Construction Project. Excavation for Foundation Laying and Backfilling Does Not Amount to 'Illegal Excavation' Under Section 48(7) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

5 Jul 2017

The petitioner, M/s BGR Energy Systems Limited, was awarded a contract by Maharashtra State Power Generation Company Limited (MAHAGENCO) for construct...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lokayukta Report in Mining Lease Dispute — Report Under Section 12(3) of Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 Set Aside for Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Lack of Jurisdiction. The Lokayukta's recommendation to cancel mining lease and initiate criminal proceedings was quashed as the petitioner was not heard before the report was made.

13 Jul 2015

The petitioner, M/s Kumaraswamy Mineral Exports Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a report d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Mining Lease Recommendation Under Section 11(3) of Mines and Minerals Act. The Court upheld the Minister's recommendation for grant of mining lease to respondent no.3, finding no violation of natural justice or procedural irregularity.

19 Dec 2011

The petitioner, M/s Veet Rag Homes Private Limited, challenged the order dated 25.4.2008 of the Minister (Industries & Mining) recommending grant of m...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)