Search Results for "Maharashtra Rent Control Act 1999"

668 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 668 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Appellate Officer's Order Under Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Act. The Judgment Text Is Truncated and Does Not Contain the Court's Final Disposition or Legal Findings.

The Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board, a unit of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA), filed a series of eigh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree Against Tenant for Change of User from Residential to Commercial. Tenant's Use of Premises for Storing Cloth Packages and Business Constitutes Change of User Under Rent Control Legislation.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the original defendants (tenants) challenging the judgment and decree of the lower Appellate C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Tenant for Unauthorised Permanent Construction Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. Tenant's temporary structure argument rejected as Appellate Court found MS angles, asbestos sheets, and polythene roof constituted permanent construction causing danger to building.

The case involves a dispute between the respondent-landlord, Kadambagiri Estates Pvt. Ltd., and the petitioner-tenant, Mrs. Binaifer Batiwala, over ev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Section 13-B of East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 for NRI Landlords in Chandigarh and Punjab. Constitutional validity of provision granting immediate possession to Non-Resident Indians upheld as reasonable classification under Article 14.

The appeals were filed by tenants challenging the constitutional validity of Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, which g...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Quashes Appellate Order Dismissing Eviction Suit, Holding Suit Not Barred by Limitation and Licensee Not Tenant, and Remands for Fresh Hearing. License Agreement Did Not Create Tenancy; Defendants Failed to Prove Protected Licensee Status Under Section 15A of Bombay Rent Act.

This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenged the judgment and order dated 25.06.2003 passed by the Appellate ...