WRIT PETITION NO.4761 OF 2024
19 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "Maharashtra Entertainment Duty Act"
134 result(s) found
Found 134 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition as Barred by Delay and Laches in Project Affected Person Employment Case. Claim for Reinstatement Rejected After 27-Year Delay from Denial Letters.
11 Mar 2025The petitioner, Shri Uday Laxman Pawar, claiming to be a Project Affected Person (PAP), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of...
- 1001
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Commercial Appeal Against Rejection of Interim Relief in Contract Dispute — Holds That Arbitrability of Disputes Does Not Bar Grant of Interim Measures Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court Remands Matter for Fresh Consideration on Merits, Emphasizing That Prima Facie Case, Balance of Convenience, and Irreparable Loss Must Be Examined.
8 Feb 2024The appellant, M/s. Ambarwadikar and Company, a registered partnership firm engaged in infrastructure business, filed a commercial appeal against a co...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Commercial Arbitration Application Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Loan Agreement Contains Valid Arbitration Clause. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator to Adjudicate Dispute Over Unpaid Loan Amount of Rs. 1,50,00,000.
28 Jul 2023The applicant, Aditya Birla Finance Ltd., filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of ...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against MIDC for Unilateral Rescission of Land Allotment — MIDC's Action Held Arbitrary and Violative of Natural Justice. Concluded Contract Exists Upon Acceptance of Consideration, Entitling Petitioner to Specific Performance.
30 Nov 2017The petitioners, Kamlakar Bhimrao Patil and Terrafirm Softtech Private Limited (formerly Everest Realtors Pvt. Ltd.), filed a writ petition under Arti...
- 133
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Enhancement of Maintenance to Wife Under Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956. Family Court's Order Enhancing Maintenance from Rs.3000 to Rs.8000 per Month Upheld as Not Perverse.
6 Sep 2016The petitioner, Prakash S. Randive, challenged the order dated 21 January 2016 of the Family Court, Mumbai, which enhanced the maintenance payable to ...
- 459
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over 'Café Madras' Restaurant Name. The mark 'Café Madras' held to be inherently distinctive and entitled to protection against use by a subsequent restaurant of the same name.
11 Mar 2015The plaintiffs, the Kamath family, have been running a restaurant named 'Café Madras' in Matunga, Mumbai since 1938. The restaurant has acquired a re...
- 101
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Letters Patent Appeal as Not Maintainable Against Single Judge Order in Landlord-Tenant Dispute. Appeal Under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Not Maintainable Where Single Judge Exercises Supervisory Jurisdiction Under Article 227 Over Civil Court Orders.
1 Oct 2010The case arose from a landlord-tenant dispute. The respondents (landlords) had filed a civil suit for eviction of the appellant (tenant). The trial co...
- 101
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Dealer's Possession Licence Under Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933 for Aero Model Sports Enthusiast. The court held that refusal of licence was arbitrary and violative of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution, directing grant of licence for remote control models.
4 Mar 2005The petitioners, Sidharth Model Sports Pvt. Ltd. and Prof. Shivajirao Katale, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a dealer's po...
- 82
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Against SARFAESI Proceedings by DBS Bank — Foreign Bank Not Required to Register Under Section 2(1)(c) of SARFAESI Act for Enforcement of Security Interest. The court held that a foreign bank with a branch in India is a 'bank' under Section 2(1)(c) read with the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, and can enforce security interest under Section 13 of the SARFAESI Act.
30 Nov -0001The judgment involves two writ petitions: Writ Petition No. 1338 of 2016 filed by Narendra Plastic Private Limited and Neemit Punamiya against DBS Ban...
- 14
