Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act 1963"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act 1963"

124 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 124 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Division Bench Pronounces Judgment on Constitutional Validity of Karnataka Civil Courts (Amendment) Act, 2023 and Karnataka High Court (Amendment) Act, 2023. The Verdict on the Appeal and Connected Petition Remains Unstated in the Available Excerpt of the Judgment.

8 Jul 2026

The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, comprising Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice C.M. Poonacha, heard a writ appeal a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Borrowers' Writ Petitions Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings by Cooperative Bank — Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act Held Efficacious. Petitioners Directed to Approach Debt Recovery Tribunal for Relief Against Recovery Actions.

9 Mar 2015

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by borrowers (Arun Dattatraya Narake and others) against the Authorized Officer of Kolhapur Dist...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Termination by District Central Cooperative Bank, Holding It Not a State Under Article 12. Cooperative Bank Employee's Challenge to Dismissal Fails as DCC Bank Is Not an Instrumentality of the State and No Violation of Natural Justice Established.

4 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Kiran Rangnath Kale, was employed as a Manager at the Beed District Central Cooperative Bank (respondent No. 3). He was initially appo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of APMC Chairman Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act, 1963. Petitioner Argues That District Deputy Registrar Lacked Jurisdiction to Decide Rule 10(2) Disqualification Because Only Rule 10(3) Powers Were Delegated by Notification Dated 12.02.2020.

26 Sep 2025

The litigation arose from the disqualification of the petitioner, who was the Chairman and a member of Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Udgir, r...

11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)