Search Results for "Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Tribunal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Tribunal"

161 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 161 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging BCCI Disciplinary Committee's Refusal to Recuse Members. Natural Justice Requires Impartial Adjudication; Bias Allegations Against Committee Members Must Be Examined.

15 Sep 2010

The petitioner, Lalit Kumar Modi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 11th August 2010 of ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Regularization of Contract Labour as Permanent Workmen. Employer Failed to Prove Genuineness of Contract Labour System, and Concurrent Findings of Fact by Industrial Tribunal and Appellate Authority Were Not Perverse.

28 Sep 2012

The case involves a writ petition filed by Western Coalfields Limited (the employer) under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challengi...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Writ Petition by State Transmission Utility and Load Dispatch Centre Against Central Electricity Regulatory Commission's Order Striking Down a Condition in Open Access Clearance. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission held that Regulation prevails over administrative condition, but State Load Dispatch Centre argues its statutory function under Sections 31 and 32 of Electricity Act, 2003 is being overridden.

22 May 2023

The writ petition was filed by the Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation (KPTCL) and the State Load Dispatch Centre (SLDC) under Articles 226 and 2...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award Challenge as Barred by Limitation — Section 4 of Limitation Act Does Not Extend 30-Day Condonable Period Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration Act When It Expires During Court Vacation. The Court held that Section 4 of the Limitation Act applies only to the 3-month prescribed period, not to the 30-day condonable period under the proviso to Section 34(3), and Section 10 of the General Clauses Act is inapplicable.

1 Jan 2025

The case involves an appeal by My Preferred Trans Formation & Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. and another against M/s Faridabad Implements Pvt. Ltd. arising fro...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Electricity Procurement Dispute, Upholding High Court's Direction for Power Purchase from Successful Bidders. The Court affirmed that the Request for Proposal process under Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003, is binding, and the reduction of procurement quantum from 1000 MW to 500 MW was invalid, requiring adherence to original bid outcomes.

8 Jan 2024

The dispute originated from Rajasthan's initiative to procure 1000 MW of electricity through a competitive bidding process under Section 63 of the Ele...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Whether Bihar Government Scheme Can Impose Housing Obligation on Employer in Industrial Dispute. The Industrial Tribunal and Labour Appellate Tribunal Had Upheld the Demand for Quarters, Directing Construction of 15 Units Under the Scheme.

23 Apr 1959

The case arose from an industrial dispute between The Patna Electric Supply Co., Ltd. and its Workers’ Union regarding the demand for housing quarte...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Payment of Labour Court Award Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Labour Court has power to award interest for period between date of award and actual payment to prevent miscarriage of justice.

4 Feb 2010

The petitioner, Mrs. Prabhavati Ramgarib B., filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal and Labour Cour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Jurisdiction of Civil Court in Possession Dispute Involving Family Members. Section 33 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Held Not to Bar Suit as Tenancy Question Not Directly Arising.

16 Jun 2014

The appeal before the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court arose from an order of a learned Single Judge deciding a preliminary issue of jurisdicti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Payment of Labour Court Award Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Interest Act, 1978 and Article 226 of Constitution Invoked to Prevent Miscarriage of Justice.

4 Feb 2010

The petitioner, Mrs. Prabhavati Ramgarib B., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of the Central...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Reference on Interpretation of Section 9A CPC (Maharashtra Amendment) — Jurisdiction Includes Limitation. The court examines whether the expression 'jurisdiction of the Court to entertain such suit' under Section 9A includes the issue of limitation, doubting the correctness of Foreshore Cooperative Housing Society v. Praveen D. Desai.

4 Oct 2019

The Supreme Court considered a reference made by a Division Bench doubting the correctness of the decision in Foreshore Cooperative Housing Society Li...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)