Search Results for "MRTU PULP Act"

583 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 583 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petitions Challenging Industrial Court Jurisdiction in Contract Labour Dispute. Court Upholds Industrial Court's Power to Entertain Complaint for Direct Employment and Permanency Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Raymond Ltd. challenging the jurisdiction of the Industrial Court to entertain complaints filed by c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Employer's Failure to Implement Award and Settlement Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 9 Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Tata Yazaki Autocomp Ltd., a company manufacturing wire harness for the automobile sector employing around 500 permanent workmen in Pu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Petition Challenging Interlocutory Order in Domestic Enquiry — Holds That Item 1 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act Cannot Be Invoked Against Every Interlocutory Order Passed by Enquiry Officer

The petitioner, Vinod Pattar, a workman employed by M/s. EIH Ltd. (the Oberoi Hotel), challenged an interlocutory order dated 21/12/2021 passed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Interim Reinstatement Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Labour Court's Direction to Reinstate Workman with Full Wages Pending Complaint Upheld as Proper Exercise of Power Under Section 30(2) of MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai dated 25th October 2005, which dismissed its revision...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows MSRTC's Petition Against Labour Court Order Granting Benefits to Misappropriating Employee. Court holds that without a finding of unfair labour practice under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 or Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, no relief can be granted on sympathy.

The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) challenged the judgment of the Labour Court dated 20.8.1996 and the Industrial Court dated 13...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Workmen. Employer Failed to Prove Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and Workmen Had Completed 240 Days of Service.

The petitioner, Raymond UCO Denim Private Ltd., challenged the order dated 1.1.2009 passed by the Industrial Court, Yavatmal in ULP Complaint No.27 of...