Search Results for "MPDA Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "MPDA Act"

260 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 260 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Proximate Link Between Offences and Public Order. Preventive detention set aside as criminal activities did not disturb public order, only law and order.

17 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Sangita Nandu Toradmal, mother of the detenue Sanket @ Khoonkhar Dadya Nandu Toradmal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Communication of Grounds in Language Known to Detenue. Failure to Provide Grounds in Hindi or Marathi Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 8 of MPDA Act, 1981.

13 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Vinod Tuljaram Bandichode, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 (MPDA) by an order dated 10...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Preventive detention set aside as the Detaining Authority failed to consider that the petitioner was already in judicial custody and no credible material showed likelihood of release on bail.

4 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Daksh Juber Ghelani, challenged his preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootle...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Violation of Section 3(2) Proviso — Initial Detention Cannot Exceed Six Months. The court held that the proviso to Section 3(2) of the MPDA Act mandates an initial detention period of only six months, and a 12-month initial order is illegal.

3 Apr 2023

The petitioner, Himanshu Roy, challenged a detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur, on 30 July 2022, confirmed by the State of Ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Improper Verification of In-Camera Statements. Failure to Record Subjective Satisfaction on Truthfulness of Secret Witnesses Renders Detention Invalid Under Section 3 of MPDA Act.

19 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Pravin Ganpat Kakad, challenged an order of detention dated 21.08.2020 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nashik City under Section...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Detenu Already in Judicial Custody — Failure to Consider Less Drastic Remedy Renders Detention Invalid. The court held that a preventive detention order cannot be sustained when the detenu is already in custody and the detaining authority fails to consider the possibility of resorting to less drastic remedies such as cancellation of bail.

4 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Sagar Prakash Bhosale, challenged a preventive detention order dated 1 June 2015 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Vague In-Camera Statements — Failure to Furnish Date, Time, and Place of Incidents Violates Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation. The Court held that withholding details of incidents beyond witness identity renders statements vague and infringes Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

28 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Satish Shivcharan Samudre, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind to Bail Conditions. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority failed to consider that detenu was on bail and conditions ensured no prejudicial activity.

7 Oct 2006

The petitioner, Intezar Umar Daraj Khan, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 31st October 2005 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mum...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Public Order Disturbance — Demand of Money from Individual Worker Does Not Affect Public Order. The court held that an incident of demanding money from a single person, without more, does not disturb public order and cannot justify preventive detention under Section 3 of the MPDA Act.

28 Jul 2006

The petitioner, Vinod Ramjiyawan Rajbhar, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offend...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Continued Detention Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Consideration of Representation. Failure of Detaining Authority to Consider Detenu's Representation Before State Government Approval Violates Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

19 Jan 2005

The petitioner, Arif Amin Shaikh, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Dru...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)