Search Results for "Lokayukta investigation"

172 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 172 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Prevention of Corruption Act Case, Reinstating FIR Quashed by High Court. Preliminary Enquiry Not Mandatory Under Section 17 When Superintendent of Police Orders Investigation Based on Detailed Source Report Disclosing Cognizable Offence.

The State of Karnataka appealed against the Karnataka High Court's order quashing proceedings against a public servant for offences under the Preventi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Bribery Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Anil Meshram, a BSNL employee, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gadchiroli for demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs. 1,500 from com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction. Sanctioning Authority's Admission of Using Draft Sanction Without Independent Application of Mind Renders Prosecution Void Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Ramesh Khandu Salve, a BMC Inspector, charged under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition to Quash Order Refusing Discharge in Criminal Case — Sanction Requirement Under Section 197 CrPC Not Applicable to Retired Police Officers for Acts Done in Official Capacity.

The petitioners, six retired police officers, were accused in C.C.No.723/2013 pending before the II Addl. Civil Judge and JMFC, Ballari. They filed ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Tax Superintendent in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Vijaykumar Marotrao Daiwalkar, was a Tax Superintendent in the Municipal Council, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Tax Superintendent in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Vijaykumar Marotrao Daiwalkar, was a Tax Superintendent in the Municipal Council, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Ch...