Search Results for "Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989"

170 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 170 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Negligence of Driver Upheld, Multiplier Applied Correctly. The Court enhanced compensation from Rs.15,47,000 to Rs.18,47,000 by adding future prospects and applying multiplier 18 under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the parents of the deceased, Samilulla and Ashrafunisa, seeking compensation for the dea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Accident Victim and Fixes Liability on Insurance Company in Motor Vehicle Accident Case. Claimant sustained grievous injuries due to driver's negligence; Insurance Company held liable as no evidence of invalid license.

The case involves an appeal filed by the claimant under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated 27.06...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Charge Sheet in Lokayukta Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of PC Act. Petitioner, a retired Superintendent, was charged under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 without prior sanction from competent authority, rendering proceedings invalid.

The petitioner, Sri S.V. Nandaraju, a retired Superintendent, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 Cr.P.C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — No Contributory Negligence by Deceased Driver. Insurer Failed to Prove Negligence of Deceased in Head-On Collision with Tempo; MACT Award of Rs. 71,36,917 Upheld.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the respondents (claimants) being the legal heirs of Sudam Auti, who died in a head-on collision ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal and Finds Compensation Awarded to Family of Quadriplegic Army Officer Inadequate. MACT Award of Rs.13,09,500 on Death Basis Held Not Just; Court Directs Enhancement Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for Tetraplegia Resulting from Road Accident.

The case arose from a motor vehicle accident on 17 October 1991, when Bhagendra Singh, a non-commissioned officer in the Indian Army, was struck by a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Milk Tanker Driver Established by Minor Son's Testimony. Court upholds award of Rs.1,65,000 to widow and children of deceased Kailashchandra under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra and other appellants appealed against the judgment and award dated 5 August 1995 of the Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal (MACT)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by Injured Claimant and Dismisses Appeal by Owner in Motor Accident Claim — Compensation Enhanced for Head Injury and Permanent Disability. Claimant awarded Rs. 8,50,000 with interest at 6% per annum from date of petition.

The case arises from a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 25.11.2006, when the claimant, P. Bharath, a 20-year-old student, was riding his bicycl...