Search Results for "Indian Evidence Act privilege"

189 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 189 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Advocate Petitioner in Land Fraud Case Under IPC Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 166 read with Section 34 Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Legal Advice Not Constituting Offence

The petitioner, an advocate, filed a criminal writ petition challenging orders impleading him as an accused in a land fraud case under IPC sections --...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Appellant in PMLA Case Due to Prolonged Incarceration and No Likelihood of Speedy Trial — Twin Conditions Under Section 45 PMLA Relaxed as Bail is Rule and Jail is Exception.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Prem Prakash against the judgment of the High Court of Jharkhand which had dismissed his bail application in a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Anticipatory Bail Application Maintainable Despite Applicant's Custody in Another Crime. Section 438 CrPC Does Not Bar a Person Already Arrested in a Different Case from Seeking Pre-Arrest Bail.

The applicant, Amar S. Mulchandani, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC in connection with C.R.No.806 of 2019 registered at ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Employer's Appeals in Industrial Dispute Over Transfer Orders. Transfer Orders Declared Illegal for Violating Section 9A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 as They Constituted Illegal Change Without Notice and Altered Work Nature.

The dispute arose from transfer orders dated 13.01.2015 issued by Caparo Engineering India Ltd., the employer, transferring nine workmen from its Dewa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Penal Back Billing Order in Electricity Theft Case — No Evidence of Tampering or Pilferage. Mere Fluctuation in Load Factor Does Not Attract Penal Provisions Under Clause 42.05 of Conditions of Supply of Electricity.

The petitioner, M/s Eureka Forbes Limited, a public limited company, owned a composite premises in Bommasandra Industrial Area, Bengaluru. In 2007, it...