Search Results for "Income Tax Evasion"

163 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 163 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition Filed by Customs Department in Customs Act Case — DRI Officers Held as Proper Officers. The Court overruled earlier decisions and upheld Section 28(11) of the Customs Act, 1962 as constitutionally valid, restoring the Department's power to issue show cause notices.

The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions led by Review Petition No. 400 of 2021, considered the correctness of its earlier judgment in M/s Canon Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail in Corruption Case Involving IRS Officer. High Court's Order Quashed for Failing to Consider Gravity of Offence Under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The case arises from two criminal appeals filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the complainant, Rupesh Balwantbhai Brambhatt, agains...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Quashes Reassessment Notice Issued to Non-Existing Entity in Income Tax Reopening Case — Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Invalid as Issued Against Merged Company.

The petitioner, Siemens Limited, challenged a notice dated 30 March 2015 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit — Holds That High Court Erred in Dismissing Suit on Grounds Not Raised in Pleadings and Without Considering Documentary Evidence. The Court restored the decree for recovery of Rs.96,41,765.31 with interest at 15% per annum from the date of suit till payment.

The appellant, M/s Star Paper Mills Limited, filed a suit for recovery of Rs.96,41,765.31 against the respondents, M/s Beharilal Madanlal Jaipuria Ltd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SAFEMA Forfeiture Case — Notice to Convict Not Mandatory When Property Held by Relatives. The Court held that proceedings against relatives under Section 6 of SAFEMA are independent and do not require prior notice to the convict.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a Madras High Court judgment that had set aside forfeiture orders under the Smugglers and Foreign Exc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge to Penalty Under Excise Rules for Short-lifting of Liquor by CL-9 Licensees. Court Decides in Light of Earlier Decision in Lakshmi Bar and Restaurant, Allowing Petitioners to Raise Further Grounds.

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by various CL-9 license holders, including bars and restaurants, challenging the imposition o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Penalty Under Excise Rules for Short-Lifting of Liquor. The court heard arguments on additional grounds after noting that the issue was covered by a previous order in Lakshmi Bar and Restaurant Case.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of connected writ petitions filed by several CL-9 licence holders, including M/s. High Point Hotels Pvt. Ltd...