Search Results for "Himachal Pradesh"

190 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 190 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Disclosure Statement and Lack of Corroborative Evidence. Conviction under Sections 392 and 397 IPC Set Aside as Recovery of Common Articles and Hostile Witnesses Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appeal arose from a robbery case where the appellant was convicted under Sections 392 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) by the Trial Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Daily Wage Employees in Industrial Disputes Act Case, Reinstating Tribunal Award. Termination Without Section 25F Compliance Held Void Regardless of Appointment Irregularity Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The dispute originated from the termination of daily wage non-teaching staff at Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit. The employees were initiall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Industrial Dispute, Upholding High Court's Finding of Civil Court's Lack of Jurisdiction. Civil Court Lacks Jurisdiction to Entertain Suits Founded on Provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Rendering Such Decrees a Nullity.

The dispute originated from the termination of a daily wage employee by the Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board on 1.1.1985. The employee filed C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Transfer Petition in Matrimonial Case Under CPC Section 25. Transfer Granted from Delhi to Nainital Family Court Considering Family Connections in Haldwani and Geographical Separation of Parties.

The Supreme Court of India heard a transfer petition filed under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The petitioner sought transfer of a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Electricity Duty Case Due to Statutory Interpretation. Levy Under Bihar Electricity Duty Act 1948 Not Applicable as Supply Was to Licensee, Not Consumer as Defined Under Sections 2(b) and 2(ee).

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Patna High Court dated 18 September 2017, which declined to entertain a writ petition filed by the appellant, ...