Search Results for "Guarantor's Liability"

255 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 255 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal Against High Court's Mandamus to Consider OTS Application. Court Holds That No Writ of Mandamus Can Be Issued to Direct a Bank to Grant One Time Settlement Benefit Under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court which, in exercise of powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, iss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging E-Auction Sale Due to Alternate Remedy Under SARFAESI Act. Petitioner, as second highest bidder, alleged collusion and system malfunction but was directed to approach Debts Recovery Tribunal.

The petitioner, Radhika Rajesh Agarwal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Revoke Leave Under Clause XII Letters Patent in Summary Suit on Guarantee. Jurisdiction upheld as part of cause of action arose in Mumbai due to disbursement and part payments.

The appeal arose from a summary suit filed by Rabo India Finance Limited (Plaintiff) against Gouri Prasad Goenka (Defendant) based on guarantees execu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Recovery Suit in Hire Purchase Agreement Case — Plaintiff Entitled to Outstanding Instalments and Damages. Breach of Contract by Defendant No.1 and Guarantor Liability of Defendant No.2 Established Under Hire Purchase Agreement.

The plaintiff, Tata Engineering & Locomotive Co. Ltd., filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 72,311/- with interest on the principal amount of Rs. 63,677/-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows SFC Petition for Enforcement of Guarantee Under Section 31(1)(aa) of SFC Act, 1951. Guarantor's Liability Held Co-extensive with Principal Debtor Despite Non-Enforcement Against Principal Debtor.

The petitioner, SICOM Limited, a State Financial Corporation, filed a petition under Section 31(1)(aa) of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Financial Institution's Petition Under Section 31(1)(aa) of SFC Act for Enforcement of Mortgage Against Guarantors. The court held that the petition is maintainable against guarantors and not barred by limitation under Article 137 of Limitation Act.

The petitioner, SICOM Limited, a financial institution, filed a petition under Section 31(1)(aa) of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows SICOM Limited's Petition Under Section 31(1)(aa) of SFC Act for Recovery of Loan Against Guarantors. Court holds that guarantors are jointly and severally liable for the debt of the principal borrower company.

The petitioner, SICOM Limited, a financial institution under the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951, filed a petition under Section 31(1)(aa) of th...